J. Randall Murphy
Not exactly. I am simply going with what you yourself have to say. I have not yet said that you are being unreasonable. I have said that you have a different way of processing information than I do.It's not a question of 'the sort of comments I'd like to see'. You continue to represent me as unreasonable and thesis-driven.
Now it's you who are accusing me of being unreasonable. Not to worry. I recognize it as a projection reaction to your false assumption about my intentions.Actually, that shoe belongs on your foot, so pls realize it and wear it.
To validate the above, you would need to do more than make a proclamation. Of course, if you practiced anything close to the Socratic Method or critical thinking yourself, then you would know that, and you would also find more value in my approach rather than being unconstructively critical of it. Consequently, your comment carries zero weight for me. So you'll have to do better if you want to make a valid point.Also, I don't see your style of argument as deserving of description as an example of the Socratic Method, or (as I've said before) of critical thinking.
All I've done is give you the opportunity to comment in your own way on the content you have posted. If you consider that as "getting on your case", then you have some communication problems you should seek some independent guidance on. Maybe this might help:Finally, as I've asked you once or twice before in this forum, do me a favor and get off my case.