Progress? - How Come A 21-Year-Old Mac Plus Can Whip An '07 DualCore Athlon?
Posted by Charles W. Moore on 06/01 at 10:31 AM
Hal Licino over at Hubpages has posted a fascinating shootout between a 1986 Mac Plus vs. a brand new '07 AMD DualCore, asking rhetorically: "We are in the third decade of global personal computing, and have we really progressed that far?"
This at first blush seems like a truly David and Goliath sort of bakeoff. After all, that little classic Mac with its tiny 9" black and white 1-bit display, puny 8MHz Motorola 68000 processor, and its memory capacity maxed out at a whopping 4 MB, is micro-powerful compared with the AMD dual-core Athlon 64 with each core running at 2.4 GHz theoretically estimated to be 600 to more than 1,000 times faster than the old Mac Plus. and with its not even near maxed-out 1,024MB of RAM being about 250 times more memory than the maxed-out Plus.
The Mac Plus had an external SCSI 40MB Hard Drive - the AMD an internal IDE 120GB Hard Drive or some 3,000 times greater data capacity, yet the drives on both machines were under 10% filled....
The Mac was running Apple System 6.0.8, and the AMD box Windows XP Professional SP2..
Hal ran a series of comparative benchmarks with the two machines performing selected common computing tasks, "that reflect how the user perceives the computing experience," including functions in contemporaneous versions of Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel, and arrived at the conclusion that:
".....For the functions that people use most often, the 1986 vintage Mac Plus beats the 2007 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+: 9 tests to 8! Out of the 17 tests, the antique Mac won 53% of the time! Including a jaw-dropping 52 second whipping of the AMD from the time the Power button is pushed to the time the Desktop is up and useable."
"When we compare strictly common, everyday, basic user tasks between the Mac Plus and the AMD we find remarkable similarities in overall speed, thus it can be stated that for the majority of simple office uses, the massive advances in technology in the past two decades have brought zero advance in productivity."