Search results

No - I mean in the present. But you're kinda trying to pull a covfefe and distract from the issue. The US is looking foolish right now because of a political party that has no basis in reality.

Yes. Deserts should stay deserts! It is in our best interest for the Earth to stay as is or do as much as possible not to change it. We are responsable.

That's a little different than an entire world with different ecosystems. You see that, right?

Well, that's not helpful. I can post the study that shows this if you wish, but we all realize that really won't change your mind. It's actually something that was observed over 17 years. Have a look if you want: http://www.pnas.org/content/113/38/10589.full.pdf

We're actually at the point where more CO2 will not help plants, and the heat that it's causing is actually decreasing plant productions. So yes, we all want a greener Earth, but more CO2 is not the way to get there.

You're one hundred percent right about this. Trump's decision to pull out of the accord is not based in science and is purely political. At least you're aware of this.

This is what's is called the Backfire Effect. Whatever facts you present to someone entrenched in a position, those facts will actually affirm their position. There's really no arguing this topic as minds will not be changed, regardless of facts. In the meantime, here's a great article by...

This really shouldn't be a political issue though - the entire world agrees on this except for the USA. In most places both conservative and liberal governments are able to see past political divides and actually look at the facts and the science. Sad!

Yeah, there's nothing concrete there, but it's a lot of fun to speculate. Chances are extraordinarily high that it's all just debris of some kind.

I went into this whole issue on my podcast last night in an episode that we'll be releasing in the next few weeks. I always liked this case because it did involve some interesting observations, although nothing really points to anything to do with aliens. The account that does talk about...

These are pretty neat. I wonder what they could be - the first one seems to be something with the film perhaps.

It looks like the authors of the most famous book about the Rendelsham Forest incident are arguing. It seems as though one of the authors no longer believes the other about his account about what happened. Take a look at the article. A few well known names are mentioned.

Did you have any hope that it would actually be good? Anything with Greer involved needs to be approached with caution. It unfortunate that something like this gets the most mainstream promotion of anything to do with UFOs.

Aren't all of those examples just dust or debris floating around the ISS as it orbits around the planet? There isn't anything there that I feel would be anything extraordinary, but I'm open to discussing why they are examples of something that's unidentified.

I found the exchanges between Randall and Chris to be pretty cordial. I wish more people could be so civil to each other.

Agreed - I'm not sure what's being discussed. Is this sort of like a Joseph Smith thing with the tablets? Maybe you can clarify in point form?

Great Canadian content on this week's show. I have mentioned it before; I live in what's considered a UFO hotspot in Quebec. I'm planning to do some good sky watching with a friend this summer and report on what we see (if anything). I've been living there since 2008 and I haven't seen anything...

I actually really like the way he explains it - logically and not jumping to any conclusions.

That's a really good point of view. Sometimes, what comes from an alleged UFO sighting is more interesting that the sighting itself.

What do you think the percentage of people that have been abducted by aliens is vs. those that only think they have been abducted by aliens is? Do you think that in most cases, the alien abduction scenario has been influenced by popular culture? For example, the notion of the "grey" alien has...