Search results

Oh sure, he's a government pro, doing essentially what many others have done.

There have been a number of claims which seem to "borrow from Roswell" as KDR put it but don't have named or living, first hand witnesses.

Grusch a "whisteblower" lol. His claim of "retaliation" is phony and intended to strengthen his credibility. Elsewhere I read that retrievals have been going on for 80 years. I don't buy cape girardeau(sp?).

He was involved in the Maury Island hoax.

A "reported whistleblower"…not even named…..I believe claims of physical evidence are true but thus is no better than what we've been hearing for decades.

At least one contactee case predated the movie.

Of course Trinity isn't the only crash hoax, or even the only pre-Roswell hoax. There's also San Antonio, allegedly in August 1945, and cape Girardeau (sp?) allegedly in 1941.

The exoplanet with the magnetic field is too hot for life, but at least this proves a prerequisite for habitability exists elsewhere. Moons of rogue planets might be warm enough but it could be a precarious existence, if sufficient warmth requires a moon be near the Roche limit.

Examples: Democrats stole the 2020 election, climate change is a hoax….

Sure seems that way but our own progress is accelerating, so maybe we can aspire to their level in a period that's relatively short with respect to historical time.

The aforementioned work portrays the government as collaborating with aliens to slowly get us used to the latter, but the official position is that ET isn't here. Ergo, I don't buy claims that UFO reports are a smokescreen to divert attention away from new military technology. There are other...

I don't think the government simulates UFO events much if at all. It just puts out misinformation to advance the same agenda as our visitors. Essentially the phenomenon, in the sense of real events, is entirely ET although aliens, not wanting us to be certain of their reality just yet...

The phenomenon does appear to be slowly conditioning us to accept its reality, albeit with an emphasis on slowly.

Lol, nothing remotely like it. "…might already be here…" Don't hold your breath waiting...

Unsolved to us laymen. And not forever. I think we'll have a definitive resolution of the issue in the latter half of this century.

It may be possible to "see" the past or future. But interact with it? I dunno...

IMO we'll reach a definite conclusion when we're ready for it. There isn't much expansion of our horizons stemming from a marginalized topic. That'll change when it's acknowledged as real and its nature is clarified.

They're in no hurry to make the masses reach a definite conclusion... The government undoubtedly knows far more than laymen but it must obscure its knowledge. Much of its misinformation is intended to make it look ignorant. There may not be "a lot" of good physical evidence but I don't think "a...

It results from a physical object, unless it's a temperature inversion or some such. But radar sightings have been supplemented by visual sightings of strange craft. There have been quite a few landing trace cases, or other evidence such as magnesium of a purity unattainable on Earth at the...

With good reason; that's what the phenomenon basically wants us to think. But it doesn't want us to be sure of it yet, hence often does things to confuse us. Another key difference is time/interdimensional travel is much less plausible. Space travel is obviously possible; we've started...