Recent content by Vomitor

I second that suggestion for sure. I think its also good to take it out of an American context more than it has been on the show recently (Nick redfern and jacques vallee dont count since they live in the US). There are tons of interesting things to discuss regarding UK cases, that hardly...

Pretty disappointing to see what came out of all this. I remember hearing the Ted Philips show and also thinking "uh-huh" when he talked about this picture. This just seems like he realized that he promised too much, got a bit desperate because of the pressure and then resorted to post/make this...

Ok i know this is no work of art, but the witnesses dont recall any major features on this, so theres nothing lost on it. Let me just give some details about this, as some might be curious: This strange object was seen by two people, who i have met recently, within a couple of years of each...

It was a good show, but i thought davids got a bit wound up about no big deal. Maybe i couldnt hear between the lines, but it seemed to me like he scoffed a bit at all other theories than ETH. And thats fine and all, but i dont see how he can resolve his paranormal experiences (as he said he had...

I'm sorry but i just don't see how Kevin Randle or anyone else did anything particularly to shoot down hopkins or jacobs arguments here. Randle's was maybe some of the weakest points i have heard in these kind of debates so far...or maybe it was just his way of presenting them...in any case, i...

Good to see that i wasnt the only one that picked up on that intriguing detail. I believe that the calendar he was talking about was this (or a variation of it): Llewellyns 2010 Astrological Calendar: Amazon.co.uk: Eric Williams: Books

Ok, i had missed that whole letter thing, not being around the forums for a while now. Well, i look forward to whatever is going to happen. As you've proven so far the show is still moving weight

This was a GREAT episode. Its a topic that deserves a whole lot more attention (outside silly average history channel "documentaries"). You guys should seriously try to get this information down into a book at some point, to make it more coherent and approachable for anyone. And Chris, you...

This was seriously a great show guys...more like this ! Lets just hope now that some of the "psychics" that roundtree mentions doesnt turn out to be another diappointment

Wasn't too impressed with this round of questioning, in fact its the first time in several months that i didnt listen to a paracast intereview until the end. Carpenter, while having his part in the whole unfolding abduction research and probably a good doctor and a nice guy, is just too...

Maybe i should just add this...Kripal seems to be very occupied with the idea of how paranormal events are created/shaped/enforced through fx. fiction. The reason i was lookin for Meheust books, is because of his work that Vallee mentions in "confrontations"...of how he has researched details of...

Forgive me if someone already has suggested this guy, but nothing came up on the immediate search. I found out about this guy Jeff Kripal by coincidence while i was looking for books by bertrand meheust translated to english (Are there any?). Anyway, this guy seems interesting for several...

Jonah> What makes you say that about dougs wife?

4 witnesses doesn't mean all that much if they aren't speaking, thats the entire point. Sandandfire - what youre talking about is one of the problems of explaining the abduction/experiencer scenario "conventionally"...wether or not you believe that it is done by the greys, many of the cases...

I'm totally on what Tom here is saying. I gotta say that if doug was one of the first people that i heard talking about abdutions, then i probably would not look much further into the subject right away. I cant say i find him de facto credible at all...holes all over his story + the reluctance...