Recent content by spacebrother

I will be succinct this time. Tom M is right: The "co-creation hypothesis" is more like a method of inquiry. I believe that I am using the word "hypothesis" relatively correctly. I attempt to explain (or explain away) nothing, and I don't think I ever said that it was an alternative to the ETH...

Is this resolved yet? Maybe you can write Gene a private message to continue if not.

Thank you for taking the time to listen to the show. My point is that we have to look at the artificial borders we have set up and ask ourselves what lies behind these borders. The closest we can get is an individual experience and reaction, which is unique to each person. I think an important...

Thank you for your acknowledgment. I mainly find the ETH "boring" because we have no objective evidence that I can see that sets it above some other theories. More importantly, the vast majority of UFO proponents adhere to this idea, and by nature, I run away from crowds because they are often...

Some people do have critical thinking skills and the ETH is a viable theory. If I implied that some ETH supporters were less than intelligent, I apologize. I am just bored with it.

There are no qualifications. Not that there should be. You just try to ignore the huge signal to noise ratio if you're trying to learn anything useful.

I was co-author with Adam Gorightly. We talked about it a bit on my show last night. Posted already at Radio Misterioso.

Make the artwork the size you want in photoshop or other image editing software by shrinking it (reduce the pixel/ inches size) and putting black around the image. You may need to experiment with it for a bit.

You are right. There is no way to know with any certainty. I like the idea that we could be seeing something that appears "conscious" simply because it reflects us back to ourselves with a slightly imperfect mirror. Maybe that qualifies as something separate and "intelligent."

Points well-taken, but recently, I have been thinking that making assumptions of any sort about the phenomenon seems to be exactly what holds us back from any further understanding. I think that we have more of a hand in "cloaking," as well as creating "teasers." The parity you refer to perhaps...

It certainly did. I have a fan club of 1!

It's a little embarrassing, but sure!

Bra. Vo.

Great points. You are not as "John Q Public" as you think. I am in general agreement with you. The subject encompasses so much data, experiences, reports, emotions, and opinions that it is nearly impossible to discern what is going on. Maybe we need to get at it is in truly as many ways as...

It would be helpful in my opinion to use terminology that is as semantically neutral as possible.