Recent content by conor

I think that no one should have nuclear weapons to be honest! But in terms of Iran having nuclear weapons, Ahmoudinijad may not want to wipe Israel off the map, but he has contempt for Israel (and Israel is the symbol for the West in the middle east). Israel is not on the best of terms with...

You could be onto something there ....

New Anti-global warming debate? Part 1 If it sniffs of a think tank of any description I'd be pretty damn weary of it.

How much does it take to go into outer space? How much does it take to go to the moon? Now, how much does it take to go to Titan, to take people to Titan? A LOT. At this time in history, using Titan as a sourch of oil is like hedging your bets on them finding a 0 point energy any time soon

Even if you don't think global warming is happening, the oil IS going to run out

He better! I'm not getting kicked off cause we disaggree over climate change:rolleyes:

New Anti-global warming debate? Part 1 Good news, no matter which side of the fence you're on

Whatevergate Don't bother Jonah. There is absolutely no point. I'm writing something for my masters about the treatment of the subject in the media. I'll post it up in a couple of days. But in the mean time, I'm outta here! Screw this thread of true believers. The hypocrasy of all this is...

Yep, and the videos I posted here are all from America. So, I am now an anti-American. Hmmmm. You love your labels! What I meant is that lobbyist groups have infiltrated the media and caused delay on a global issue. Now, produce all the non-peer reviewed propaganda you want. Rile against the...

How do we know that scientists aren't wrong. Or, from most people on this thread's perspective, how do we know that they aren't decieving us. http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/resources/globalwarming/documents/oreskes-chapter-4.pdf and the easy version...

I think, from other threads, that this would be a worthwhile endevour. It really seems like a divisive issue taht really gets under people's skin (I know it gets under mine!). Oh yeah, and this isn't a thread about the consensus in science about global warming, or what side of the fence you fall...

We got to start somewhere. Solving the energy crisis won't happen over night. I see I am now an alarmist. Well in that case you're a denier. You reject the scientific consensus as a lie, and I listen to everything that comes out of every person's mouth that seems to have authority. At least...

And I would say the exact same thing to you. Congrtulations. You are now in the same category as Dick Cheney, the entire Fox News team and Glenn Beck, all highly trustworthy sources of information with absolutley no ulterior motives. :p You have also fallen prey to a tink tank in Washington...

Not a commie, sympathetic to social democracy, you should look it up sometime. So, tell, exactly how and by whom was she debunked? Lets start there shall we, a critical look into the claims of and counter claims against Ms. Oreskes, and lets see where we can go from there, shall we? Lets try...

One name. Naomi Oreskes. Look her up, look at her talks, listen to some common sense. David, I know now why you refuse to get caught up in all this. Sense has left the building, and her weird drunkard sister is sitting on the couch and refusing to leave. I'm waiting for pixelsmith to say...