Adv Tech / AA Musing

[Illuminati0n]

We all know those ancient depictions of craft in the sky and seemingly like Egyptian hieroglyphs depicting airplanes, submarines ect. What baffles me is how is it in their mental capacity back in those days to depict such a thing without actually seeing it.

I mean, right now can you think of something that doesnt exist and or isnt a variation of something that already does. Back in the day they didnt even have contraptions such as bikes, let alone cars.

How could they have just imagined a "craft" in the sky, a flying machine unless they saw it.

Am i missing something here? Have the hieroglyphs and paintings been proved fake?

 

[pixelsmith]

Am i missing something here? Have the hieroglyphs and paintings been proved fake?

i believe they were proved to be caused by water damage.

 

[Illuminati0n]

http://crystalinks.com/ancientaircraft.html

those also?

 

[David Biedny]

W
How could they have just imagined a "craft" in the sky, a flying machine unless they saw it.

Well, I think you could attribute it to the amazing abilities of human imagination. Look at all the wacky stuff that artists and writers come up with today, stuff that no one has imagined, detailed descriptions of worlds that likely don't exist, beings that are extrapolations of what we imagine ourselves to be. Primitive humans looked to the sky, saw birds, and imagined themselves flying in the air. They caught fish, and imagined themselves living underwater, swimming without needing to come up for air. The fact that ancient human civilizations fantasized about being the children of the stars is no huge surprise to me, personally. Thousands of years ago, humans were sure that they were the center of all things in the Universe. Today, with all our technology, you would think we know better, and while we now know that we're not even vaguely the center of all things, some majority of the humans alive today are absolutely certain that whatever created everything, looks like us and stands in judgment of our every move and thought. We haven't made much progress, IMO.

dB

 

[pixelsmith]

http://crystalinks.com/ancientaircraft.html

those also?

those were the ones i was thinking of.

 

[AnnetteMarie]

I have seen those pics before, and have also read they were shaped that way from damage by water, or chipping.

So, if we accept that, then take those rough areas that indicate areas of chip/erosion damage, build them back up to add in what appears missing, and in two pics, you still have the same basic shape, but with a bit more definition and depth. Just my opinion.

as for the submarine, I live in Canada, eh, and to me, it looks like a curling stone.