I'm not anti-conspiratorial by any means, but I really think that jumping up and down at the phrase "new world order" is making a mountain out of a molehill. It is just a phrase with no objective meaning in itself. It has a lot of historical baggage, but it is still just a phrase.
I think something like the info on the PNAC website is much more revealing than a world leader uttering the phrase "new world order".
I only bring this up because I consider the phrase "new world order" to be an emotional trigger phrase, and I would like to help reduce the instinctive emotional impact of those kinds of phrases.
I think there's more to it than that. People like Kissinger don't use such a phrase by accident. He's too smart for that. Notice also how he repeated the old mantra, in that "the crises provides great opportunities", meaning, first they engineer a crisis, in order to take advantage of new opportunities that will emerge.
Kissinger, like others, gradually and carefully programme us to recognise the term "New World Order". Mainstream news publications have started to use it as well. A couple of examples:
Munich Security Conference: Searching for a New World Order - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International
"Searching for a New World Order
By Gerhard Spoerl
The closely watched Munich security conference, which starts next week, has become a large-scale summit for world leaders. This year the US is sending a high-ranking delegation, led by Vice President Joe Biden, which may seek informal dialogue with Iran on the event's sidelines."
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/do....50B4057A 907%7D
"TODD HARRISON
How realistic is a North American currency?
Commentary: Uniting U.S., Canada, Mexico money could result from crisis"
"The New World Order is upon us, full of hope, promise and a fair amount of fear. In our recent discussion regarding the direction of our country, we noted the risks of catering to conventional wisdom and the implications for the U.S. dollar."