Within the context of what Kokinda is putting forth they are.
It's hyperbole.
The tarrifs help the US - without tariffs the US has been subsidizing the world, that includes Canada.
Trump’s blanket tariff policies have slowed economic growth, increased everyday prices for consumers, and reduced manufacturing jobs in the United States, while deeply disrupting trade, causing export losses, and forcing expensive retaliation in Canada. Meanwhile, knowing which ones and when they're coming is basically the same as insider trading.
Canada is subverting the US. Canada is working with China to re-package goods to avoid the US tariffs. This is a form of smuggling.
Oh please — The USA is the biggest "smuggler" of weapons in the world.
Bypassing Congress: In May 2026, the State Department authorized nearly
$9 billion in fast-tracked arms sales to Middle Eastern partners like Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, and Israel.
Plus Canada is not abiding by its own laws when it fails to enforce the banning of goods made with forced or slave labor.
That problem isn't unique to Canada. Incarcerated workers and victims of human trafficking produce more than $11 billion worth of goods and services annually inside the United States under severe, "slave-like" conditions.
Then comes the complex situation of 'snow-washing' in BC. She cites the Cullen Committee findings.
The United States faces systemic financial vulnerabilities that directly mirror the Cullen Commission's findings in British Columbia. In fact, global transparency groups frequently label the U.S. as one of the easiest places in the world to hide and wash dirty money.
Kokinda is portraying Canada as an 'outlaw' because Canada is not playing by its own rules, and in doing so the US can't trust Canada.
Canada uses trade to erode American economic sovereignty by design.
And the USA doesn't? It's hypocritical.
I'm having trouble with this sentence. Where is the gaslighting? Kokinda is stating the situation as it is. Where is the gaslighting?
I guess if you don't see it — you've fallen for it.
What division? Big polluters? Deflecting blame? Be precise. Give details.
It's obvious — virtuially all big industry are big polluters. Excluding CO₂, America's biggest polluters are the metal mining and chemical manufacturing industries, which dump billions of pounds of toxic chemicals into the land and water, alongside agricultural and drilling companies leaking super-potent methane gas. That hasn't even scratched big-energy with its fracking that contaminates underground water supplies.
Kokinda showed the the US Energy Secretary mentioning that life expectancy has gone from 30 years to over 70 years because of energy, because of oil and gas. She quoted the Energy Secretary saying in Texas: 'There are 1 billion people in the world living awesome lives. There are 7 billion people wanting to live those awesome lives.' To do that every nation must become self-sufficient. The American System. Energy.
That's part of big industry propaganda and gaslighting ( pardon the actual pun there ) — failing to mention the harms caused by industrial waste, chemicals, ulktraprocessed foods, microplastics. Hundreds of millions of Americans are exposed to these toxins, and hundreds of thousands suffer serious illnesses directly linked to them.
Trump is doing the overhaul on a global scale. Breathtaking to watch.
More like sickening ( to me ). The world is closer to WW3 than ever before, defense spending has skyrocketed, exceeding the trillion dollar mark for the first time in history, his economic policies are causing global turmoil, inflation is higher than ever, as is the national debt, all while the USA infrastructure is crumbling.
But the system south of your border is the American System of Political Economy - which btw was being studied by SunYatSen in China, even in Russia and Japan, many places in the 1800s. The flipping of the situation at the beginning of the 20th century by the bankers changed the course of the world - we are only just getting back on track. Canada is captured by the British Imperial System - the Globalists. It is a war between the Globalists and the Sovereigntists. Your Mark Carny is a creature of the Globalists, he is one of the bankers.
Like I already said — both countries have problems, and I'd sooner work together than see people like ( what's her name ) sewing all this division.
Local. Always local. Thing is, Canada operates that way between Provinces, not so? There are tariffs between provinces? A federal government has a distinct task but should be small, deferring powers to the states that then defers to the county, city, town, village. Getting a bigger conglomerate has its problems - especially with Canadian sensibilities I am now learning, not to mention the Quebecois. There is such a different mind-set.
Like I already said — both countries have problems, and I'd sooner work together than see people like ( what's her name ) sewing all this division.
Here the difference in mind-set between Canada and the US is at its most acute. Plus the belief in Climate Change. But those who do what is necessary re energy cannot be made to support those who do not. Business is not our enemy - it is why we live awesome lives.
You're buying into big energy propaganda again. Big Energy companies have a documented, century-long track record of extracting billions of dollars in oil, gas, and coal wealth while leaving taxpayers and local communities to clean up environmental destruction.
From toxic "forever oil spills" to leaving millions of toxic open wells abandoned across North America, the energy sector frequently uses legal loopholes, bankruptcy courts, and corporate shell games to avoid cleaning up after themselves. The scope of this exploitation is massive, visible across several multi-billion-dollar crises — that's not even touching fracking and glyphosate.
If you feel the urge to deny this or brand this as some kind of "eco-extremism" — then it's a sign that the gaslighting and proganda is doing its job.
For life exepectancy — fewer wars, cleaner water, sanitation, nutrition, and antibiotics are the main contributors. Sure — at some level they can be labeled as "industries" — but not the way ( what's his name ) was spinning it.
To sum-up ( again ). North America has its problems. They can be looked at divisively or holistically. I prefer the latter. To me Kokinda's piece is just whiny anti-Canadian rhetoric that fosters division. She'd do more good taking-up knitting.
Working together, RFK Jr. and Trump's potential was massive. Instead — IMO they've both grossly underperformed. But that's nothing new — and BTW — that's not to imply that our Canadian counterpart is Mr. Fantastic either. Both systems seem to be a mess. My solution would be to foster North American unity and governmental reform in a citizen-up manner. It seems to me that those in power ( the top-down crowd ) really don't want that, and therefore have a vested interest in fostering the division.
Sorry — but I don't have the time to write a whole book complete with details and references.
But you can verify it all for yourself if you make the effort.
Here's an interesting article:
Dr Dafydd Townley writes for the Conversation.
www.port.ac.uk