I would differ to David on lot of what he discussed during the interview. Atlantis was a mighty seafaring nation according to Plato, Nowhere in the records those Plato say Atlantis had flying vehicles that could transport you around the Globe. It doesn't exist and no one has the right, to change the original story to one that suits there theory. Atlantis was mostly likely the Americas and this would match with the original story. Plato@ Atlantis lay to the west past the pillars of Hercules (Gibraltar and Spain) and it was as large as Libya and Asia combined. It's obvious then, it could only be the Americas.
Now i will a speculate to were Atlantis was, David practices this so why not me. I believe it was an Empire that was inland, not in the Atlantic, it was surrounded by Rivers, and it stretched for hundreds of miles, and Evidence for Atlantis has already been found, overlooked, for whatever reason. I believe, Pumu Punku, is part of this lost Civilization. The Archaeological ruins in my estimation are over 12,000 or 15,000 years old. Atlantis existed 12,000 to 10,000 years ago according to Plato. We don't have to look for imagined locations around the world for Atlantis, when we have ruins existing today in Bolivia that defy logic. There is no evidence this civilization created amazing weapons or build amazing spaceships, but to the Greeks, if they truly sailed to these locations in the distant past. Long after the inhabitants perished. The level of craftmanship and stonework, they saw at Pumu Punku. Even for the Greeks who were the most advanced race in classical times, they be flabbergasted with it all.
Of course, this is just some idle speculation not fact. But it could explain the Atlantis myth, when you take a moment, and review what we do now. For the Greeks the newly discovered land, would have no name. So maybe Greek explorers called it Atlantis since we do now lot of Greek place names start with A and Even Greek Names start with A. So Atlantis equal = this newly discovered place or land?
I have many thoughts, but they are too numerous to write about in such a short amount of time. before i end my post.
The Hollow Moon Theory (Hmmm). David; the Moon was towed to were it is today. I laughed, who wouldn't, come on!! Some of his theories are far fetched. The moon has proven to be a strange place by all accounts. But I would call into question. The idea that the Moon was put together with pieces from a smashed planet, that blew up long ago. If can be proven with Science I will gladly change my mind. I don't belief science has all the answers, but it has the equipment to answer this one.
Also the moon might look like Dark Vader's Mothership, but it's not a spaceship in Orbit!!
The Easter Island statues were not build by Polynesians. I have an opposing view to David. My theory is largely based upon discoveries that were hushed up by the New Zealand government. Archaeologists found Mummies in the ground, and never released the information to the public. The information was leaked. The Mummies weren't Maori.
