I agree about Mr. Harzan's answer about Mr. Bigelow's involvement with MUFON, dr.abbadon. It seems as though Mr. Harzan has either learned a lesson from what happened to James Carrion when he questioned the billionaire's relationship with MUFON, or Mr. Harzan actually believes what he is saying. Or, maybe it's both. Who knows. It just seems like Mr. Bigelow has been, on balance, a more negative than positive influence on the subject. And, Mr. Harzan's unwillingness or inability to address the inequality of MUFON's relationship with the billionaire is troubling.
And, while I understand that it is important to take Mr. Harzan's impression of Dr. Greer from the latter's presentation for what it's worth (as one person's opinion), isn't it also a bit disconcerting to know that Mr. Harzan's BS meter is that faulty? Taking the cash out of the equation (which no one in this field seems to be able to do), Dr. Greer is a liar. His little alien was a hoax. His "documentaries" are Times Square sidewalk shell games designed to squeeze every last dime that's left in and bit of notoriety from the UFO subject.
Of course, Dr. Greer can do whatever he wants to sell wolf tickets. Hey, I enjoy good science fiction as much as the next person! But when the one of the leading figures of the one supposedly legitimate UFO organization buys into the barking, it does not seem to bode well for the future progression of the subject.
But, maybe I'm wrong. I know there are people out there who think any publicity is good publicity for the attention-starved UFO field. And, to those people, maybe attention equals cash, which then leads to more research. I can see where they might get that idea, but I'm just not one of those people.