I am lost for words after listening to the interview with karl.
His views and opinions are so silly. Kelly johnson a pioneer in the aviation industry, a man who knew more about the human aviation than most, witnessed a solid craft. 'Which he, could not identify, doing speeds which were remarkable to him.
And, Yet Karl doesnt care to analyse "what he is saying, Honestly the man is a better witness than anyone Karl.The sky has alot of clouds, birds, and airplanes. That is about the best you get unless you get outside our space. So, how, could Kelly be wrong in what he siad, karl? He was expert in aviation.
Alot, of the arguments by karl that were put forward centre around a theory.That "humans all humans could be prone to seeing things that are not actually there. That bullshit annoys me.
Gordon, saw what he saw Karl, Your lack credibility when you suggest a man like this would lie. Why, what need, would Gordon have to claim such an encounter?
I have to trust my eyes since i drive every morning.
Should, i stop driveing since i a human. I could see things that could effect my driveing. It silly, we have objects in Photographs and videos going back generations are they all illusions 'Really.
Explain, why they even appear in photographs. Photographs and video that are verifyed as geniune Karl.
Karl will never change his opinion.Karl believes the whole topic is woo woo. If Karl actually took time to research everything with an open mind. I might actually respect him, but i dont honestly 'because he is a debunker not a skeptic.
I think this pictures, no matter if you are a believer in ufos or a die hard skeptic. You would look at them and if you have any intellectual honesty "question, what you now to be.
http://www.ufocasebook.com/belgium1990.jpg
http://www.ufocasebook.com/walloniabelgium.jpg