David Biedny,
Well to be fair, I was already less than welcomed here in the first place.
I've been on the receiving end of the same kind of behaviour. I suppose you may have contacted those people privately to let them know to tone it down... but then I had to provide an email address to join, so why the public response? Perhaps it is in poor taste here to question members who have been here longer?
With regards to the statement itself, truth be told I was getting a little tired of responding to comments that have no basis in reality. Yet he claims that he was
Judging by his own performance, misrepresenting the facts, and downright fabricating events are his idea of a good, intelligent debate.
It's too bad, there are a great number of paranormal subjects I am interested in. But it seems that the hosts handle these questions far better than some of the posters here. No room for other points of view I guess.
The strangest part of all of this is that no one here knows me. Sure I am a chef. But I wasn't always. I would love to use what money and influence I have from my previous career to get some real research done. But I see what they mean, this area of research is a dead end, not because UFO's are a myth, but because most of the people involved have no idea how to present their ideas without exagerration or a closed mind.
I would invite Mr. Ecker, if he is interested in getting some real research done, to contact me. Otherwise, feel free to remove me from the list, I can not promise to not treat a child like a child.
Well to be fair, I was already less than welcomed here in the first place.
I've been on the receiving end of the same kind of behaviour. I suppose you may have contacted those people privately to let them know to tone it down... but then I had to provide an email address to join, so why the public response? Perhaps it is in poor taste here to question members who have been here longer?
With regards to the statement itself, truth be told I was getting a little tired of responding to comments that have no basis in reality. Yet he claims that he was
.actually hoping to hear a good, intelligent debate
Judging by his own performance, misrepresenting the facts, and downright fabricating events are his idea of a good, intelligent debate.
It's too bad, there are a great number of paranormal subjects I am interested in. But it seems that the hosts handle these questions far better than some of the posters here. No room for other points of view I guess.
The strangest part of all of this is that no one here knows me. Sure I am a chef. But I wasn't always. I would love to use what money and influence I have from my previous career to get some real research done. But I see what they mean, this area of research is a dead end, not because UFO's are a myth, but because most of the people involved have no idea how to present their ideas without exagerration or a closed mind.
I would invite Mr. Ecker, if he is interested in getting some real research done, to contact me. Otherwise, feel free to remove me from the list, I can not promise to not treat a child like a child.