• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, 11 years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Webster Tarpley, Larouche and 9/11

  • Thread starter Thread starter schticknz
  • Start date Start date
Forums New posts

Free episodes:

S

schticknz

Guest
Here's a fascinating podcast about Lyndon La Rouche. I'm not 100% familar with him (have heard of him on and off over the last few years) but he sounds like quite a fascinating character really ... even though he's apparently some sort of fascist :D

Webster Tarpley is a great fan and follower of La Rouche apparently according to this podcast ... and who am i to argue?? :D

I think it sort of explains why the 9/11 movement may have been sabotaged and hasn't really got anywhere (??)

Any comments ???

Podcast: http://gordoncomstock.com/audio/71_Weiss.mp3

(Don't listen to the Vatican/Jesuit conspiracy editions of the podcast unless you want your brain fried to a turn :P)
 
I've dodged La Rouche followers for twenty-five years at my local courthouse annex during elections. They park themselves outside with brochures and propaganda. They are very "forward" so one has to be vigilant at ignoring them.

I'd never had him explained in that particular light though. Don't know whether I believe it because his agenda has always seemed so personal rather than anti-Democratic, but it makes a certain sense.
 
Poi said:
I've dodged La Rouche followers for twenty-five years at my local courthouse annex during elections. They park themselves outside with brochures and propaganda. They are very "forward" so one has to be vigilant at ignoring them.

I'd never had him explained in that particular light though. Don't know whether I believe it because his agenda has always seemed so personal rather than anti-Democratic, but it makes a certain sense.
Click to expand...

From the podcast they seem to be extremely fascistic in nature ... and it really is quite worrying when you discover that according to the guy in the interview they will even kill people who try to leave their "cult".

Very nasty stuff. And as for Larouche and 911 ... could it be possible that the reason that the 911 truth movement has not got as far as it could is that it has been infilitrated by Larouchians?? (like Webster Tarpley???). Apparently Jeff Rense has had Larouche on his program and I think Alex Jones doesn't mind him either.

It would explain a hell of a lot in my book.
 
Could be true, I guess, but I've looked at all sides and I find extremists within the 911 truth movement too. Heck, from what we can find on the net, we should be suspect of everyone and noone.

There's a voice in the back of my head that tells me to not get caught up in all the conspiracy stuff. It is sooooo easy to do (and I have!) if one feels any residual shock from 9/11 and we all will for quite some time.

I'm in step-back mode for now. This is MY life and I'm not giving it over to conjecture that may make my remaining time here less precious. There's enough bad news that no one can hide anyway. I'll deal with that as it comes, but I'm not getting caught up with emotional types who serve personal agendas other than those that support peace, good will, understanding and all the seemingly trite ideals of yesteryear. Screw the extremes!
 
Poi said:
I've looked at all sides and I find extremists within the 911 truth movement too. Heck, from what we can find on the net, we should be suspect of everyone and noone.
Click to expand...

True. There are extremists that post on this very forum. Does this make the Paracast an extremist enterprise?

Poi said:
I'm in step-back mode for now. This is MY life and I'm not giving it over to conjecture that may make my remaining time here less precious. There's enough bad news that no one can hide anyway. I'll deal with that as it comes, but I'm not getting caught up with emotional types who serve personal agendas other than those that support peace, good will, understanding and all the seemingly trite ideals of yesteryear. Screw the extremes!
Click to expand...

I like the sound of that. It is music to my ears! :) I think we can easily forget that we are only ever responsible for our own lives, but not for the (wrong-) doings of others. I also believe that we are born to enjoy life!
 
Hurr dee hurr dee hurr hurr.. just watched an episode of MXC in which a character named "Lyndon La Douche" appears ... (son or cousin ... can't remember now, of the great Guy La Douche) ... ahhh such simple pleasures :D
 
pininmefin said:
I believe he has been safely locked up in prison for quite some time.In deleware if i remeber correctly.
Click to expand...

Nope he's out and about and pushing 86, i think. He was done for fraud in the late 80s but he's been out for some time ... since '94 in fact.

Anyway, heres yet another not necessarily 100% true wikipedia entry for your consumption :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_Larouche
 
Hey all, I'm new here...this is my first post.

I recently spent a couple hours watching some Shiller Institute lectures and I have some good AND bad things to say about LL.

First the bad. The fact that LL wants so badly to be someone of consequence is unappealing. He seems to be a megalomaniac. In listening to the lectures they occasionally refered to their "enemies" which makes LL and his organization sound paranoid. If you're on the up-and-up and are decent you don't end up involved in all sorts of things that make "enemies".

On the other hand...

Besides being an egomaniac...maybe LL is between parties because he actually IS what he aspires to be...an original thinker.

The lectures I watched were very laudable and apparently the aim is to produce indpendent and original "thinkers" who will act as leaders.

Currently we are supposed to elect representatives. But our wouldbe "representatives" style themselves "leaders" to get elected...then when they get elected they function as rulers.

If the Larouchies truly want to be "leaders" then more power to them...if they want to get in and RULE then they have to get in line behind other bums.

The Larouchies are the least of our worries when you consider the evangelical Christians who want a Theocracy and Neo-conservatives that want permenant ONE-PARTY rule. These two groups currently infest all levels of State and Federal government. They are of MUCH more concern than the Larouchies.

If you can stand the dullness... here are some lectures that can give you an idea of what the Larouch Youth are being taught.

Listen to any of the Bruce ones. http://wlym.com/video/

Hope I don't come across as an apologist...I just don't accept all the audio's accusations uncritically.

~Foo Fighter~
 
Back
Top