YOU are by far the laziest forum participant I have ever come across on this platform! Congrats!
Randall, you fielded this perfectly....Star guy (ish) reminds me of the folks in Geology who shunned tectonic plate theory, essentially the precipitation of "safety in conformity" meaning people who cite others works and posing questions they don't have the creativity or courage to ask themselves, but still wanting to derive a position on the subject. This was also done with anatomy in the 16th century, and even yoga in at the turn of the century before brain scans could validate what practitioners EXPERIENCED for centuries. The ET issue simply does not have the tools available to make definitive judgments.
BTW- Sagan did not deny the ET theory, he simply cited the lack of evidence, particularly for the ancient astronaut theory, but concluded that archeologist needed to focus more on the topic, i.e. develop the "tools" necessary to validate that particular theory.
Star guy- you're better off on the flat earth forums....PEACE!
TDSR
