Schuyler
Misanthrope
Not sure where to put this....
David,
Several times over the last few years I have come across statements about the quality of satellite imagery. One idea out there is that satellite optics are of a sufficiently high quality and resolution that they can take pictures of newspapers that are legible. Other people claim the optics are nowhere nearly as good as that. In light of Homeland Security launching a spy satellite recently, the question has arisen again.
My -uh- sources would suggest that satellite imagery is much better than commonly thought, but I'm not sure how good. My information could simply be hyperbole by people trying to sound impressive. In view of your experience do you have any information that could shed light on this? TIA
David,
Several times over the last few years I have come across statements about the quality of satellite imagery. One idea out there is that satellite optics are of a sufficiently high quality and resolution that they can take pictures of newspapers that are legible. Other people claim the optics are nowhere nearly as good as that. In light of Homeland Security launching a spy satellite recently, the question has arisen again.
My -uh- sources would suggest that satellite imagery is much better than commonly thought, but I'm not sure how good. My information could simply be hyperbole by people trying to sound impressive. In view of your experience do you have any information that could shed light on this? TIA