• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

OK, so David doesn't like discussions on the Moon landings

musictomyears

Skilled Investigator
Is this a good reason for locking an entire thread? Isn't this section of the forum labelled "conspiracy theories"?

The Apollo missions produced one of the most globally prevalent conspiracy theories - ever. It won't go away by stifling discussion about it, or making fun of it. It will only go away when all remaining questions have been answered.

Several posters asked specific questions with regard to the official record, to which they received no answers. The Paracast prides itself on fairness and intellectual rigour. I should hope this extends to all topics.
 
musictomyears said:
Is this a good reason for locking an entire thread? Isn't this section of the forum labelled "conspiracy theories"?

The Apollo missions produced one of the most globally prevalent conspiracy theories - ever. It won't go away by stifling discussion about it, or making fun of it. It will only go away when all remaining questions have been answered.

Several posters asked specific questions with regard to the official record, to which they received no answers. The Paracast prides itself on fairness and intellectual rigour. I should hope this extends to all topics.


OK, point taken. My bad.

dB
 
May I then suggest to re-open the currently locked thread, if at all possible. I posted links to several NASA images that, to my mind, contain anomalies which require further analysis. I also raised the point of inconsistencies with respect to official NASA images (no stars) and the "bootlegged" shuttle footage (a myriad of stars), which was published by the UK UFO Magazine. My main posts are here:

http://theparacast.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5195&postcount=82
http://theparacast.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5413&postcount=89
http://theparacast.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5522&postcount=92
http://theparacast.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5620&postcount=98
 
Back
Top