• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, 11 years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Is this tiny (insect ?) crawling around ?

Forums New posts

insect or rock ?

  • insect

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • rock

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Total voters
    1
  • Poll closed .

Free episodes:

universeseeker

universeseeker

Skilled Investigator
two images taken with the microscopic camera on the curiosity rover shows something tiny that moved position. Insect ? or very small rock ?

CR0_497632042PRC_F0500676CCAM04128L1.JPG


CR0_497632596PRC_F0500676CCAM04128L1.JPG


CR0_497631218PRC_F0500676CCAM03128L1.JPG
 
Last edited:
There's no movement. These are different perspective shots. Objects in relationship to the larger black object that appears to move are all still in the same formation from shot to shot. It's just a different amgle.
 
Burnt State said:
There's no movement. These are different perspective shots. Objects in relationship to the larger black object that appears to move are all still in the same formation from shot to shot. It's just a different amgle.
Click to expand...

Like I said 2 images .... I posted 3 images , maybe you didn't read it and only took a look at the pictures , but hey , I understand.
But what you are saying is that the object in picture 2 is at the same location as in picture 3 ? well , euhm , maybe you have to download both images and put them next to each other, and that will be picture 2 and 3 of course. And yes the object in picture 1 and 2 is at the same location , no one can argue about that , but make the comparisson between picture 2 and picture 3, still on the same location ? yes ? ..... I don't think so , and even someone like you can see that , but I guess that you just don't want to admit it.
 
Universe seeker why dont you admit that ALL your mars vids show rocks? Why dont you admit it is motion on these pics? Why do you use silly voices on your vids? You trying to compete with thirdphase?

Sent from my SCH-I435 using Tapatalk
 
I never hid anything. . My real name is bob my wife is Victoria or rikki I never had to hide anything. .but it seems you do by using a silly voice on your fake vids.. keep in mind I am NOT the one who is posting vids of rocks on mars keep in mind all I am doing is questioning you and your motives. I am not the hoaxer.. you are..

Sent from my SCH-I435 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
vesvehighfolk said:
Universe seeker why dont you admit that ALL your mars vids show rocks? Why dont you admit it is motion on these pics? Why do you use silly voices on your vids? You trying to compete with thirdphase?

Sent from my SCH-I435 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Euhm ... why do I have to say that it are rocks when it aren't just rocks. Of course that the martian surface is full of rocks , but the things is that there are also a lot of other objects that aren't rocks at all.
But I don't understand why you get so mad ... this is the thing that I see , so that's what I share , and most of the time someone is giving me a serious opinion or explanation (unlike you) .
But to me it is clear that the object in image 2 is not at the same position as in Image 3. there is a difference ... object outside of the lines , or object between the lines. but I shall make a drawing for you as I see it :)

But I dont think that's a reason to get mad at me.
And why do I use a computer voice ? well actually i'm dutch speaking , not english and I can't pronounce it too well, so that's why I use a computer voice , sounds better than mine lol.
And competing with "ThirdPhase" ? haha , I don't think i'm much of a competition for those guys :)

But I just want to share what I think I see. there's no harm in that is it ?

Here's the reason why I think it changed position.
On the first and second image , the object is under the two horizontal lines and in the third image , the object is between the two horizontal lines.
In image 1 and 2 , it's clear that the camera's position has changed and the object is still at the same place, but in picture 3 , the camera's position has also changed , but the object is not at the same position anymore either.

And I don't think i'm a Hoaxer .. you see .. 3 years ago , I was allready posting vids from mars that there was still liquid water... and then some people also called me a Hoaxer, but want turns out ? ;;;;; tataa , there seems to be still liquid water on the planet.
So now I see things that doesn't seems to be like rocks to me .... and maybe in 3 years ....

But now that I have your attention anyway... and you always give answers .. then I got a question for you ...
you see , my latest vids from , let's call it "rocks" then :-) are all from the same location on Mars.
so the question is "Why is did the rover stopped at that location? it hasn't moved since 22nd of september. maybe because they found something signifficant there ? you have any idea why the rover doesn't move on anymore ?
 
Last edited:
icculus said:
Please ban this fool. The forum is littered with UniverseSeeker's nonsense.
Click to expand...

Maybe I have to say that there is a PORTAL on mars , maybe then you wouldn't try to ban me :)

And there's no one that says that you have to read ti, if you don't share my vision , then just don't read it. I only want to share what I think that is out there , nothing more.
 
Back
Top