Search results

I have seen this article and others like it on so many dad gum news websites, dozens of articles, and not a single one of them crediting Mac Tonnies' book. I hope these fancy Hardvard fart professors are citing Mac Tonnies, because they're clearing lifting his theories straight out of the book...

Yes, good condition -- not trying to sell them, whoever wants them can have them. First taker gets them.

Folks, I have an old VHS tape I bought from Stan Friedman's website years ago, back in 2005 or so. It features Stan vs James McGaha in a debate. Do any of y'all want it? I may also have one of his DVDs lying around somewhere, "Are Flying Saucers Real?" or, "Flying Saucers Are Real," or...

So it's looking like ChuckleberryFinn was right, then, when he said the official stance would shift from official denial to official ambivalence, and that would be it. But more on Bob Lazar, at roughly 1:22:45 in Jeremy Corbell's documentary about Bob Lazar on Netflix, we see the alleged "cloud...

It is just an element with more protons and neutrons is what I am saying. Nothing special. It’s not like a heavier atom could somehow warp space time. To do that it would need to be very effin’ dense, like Thor’s hammer out of a neutron star. So dense that a thimble of 115 would weigh as...

I guess it is possible that Lazar just had some hair-brained theory that the engine used 115 to warp space time, and he was wrong. Maybe it was just his theory, but he seemed to put it forward as fact, as if the stuff somehow functions as di-lithium crystals in Star Trek.

Here is why I think Lazar could be full of shit. Why should an element with an atomic weight of 115 somehow possess anti gravitational properties? It is just an element with more protons and neutrons. It doesn’t make any damned sense that as depicted in his alleged cloud chamber footage the...

That said, I really hope I'm wrong. Here is another article: https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEP9D0ht3dJSdddt_0-SVAeYqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowjsP7CjCSpPQCMKCK0wU?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

The way Clapper was talking, it seems like he's seen drafts of the report, and he says it will be filled with ambiguity. So we've gone from denial to ambiguity, and I'll bet the people in this forum that this will be the extent of the changes in the official narrative. The evidence is...

In the history of UFOs over the last 60 years these kinds of buildups are always followed by huge disappointments. I bet that this June 1st report, which some in congress will see and we will not, wont change anything.

I don't really follow the story of UFOs much any more. Was Elizondo really the director of ATIP? If yes, why is he on podcasts like "That UFO Podcast" and not something more substantial?

Thanks for the link, Mr. Randall. This part of the Pentacle memorandum raises several questions: "Coverage should be so complete that any object in the air could be tracked, and information as to its altitude, velocity, size, shape, color, time of day, etc. could be recorded. All balloon...

Semi relevant: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lets-search-for-alien-probes-not-just-alien-signals/ This astronomer thinks Oumuamua was ET space junk. Maybe we'll see more of it, since we have better instrumentation to detect it.

Hey Randall, all of that SJW stuff is contagious because of social media, algorithmic facebook newsfeeds and the like, whereas a cult operates on the basis of a central, charismatic person who calls the shots and dispenses info. So the methods of indoctrination are not at all similar, except...

So, I vote "meaningless excuse." The report will say that they looked into it and nothing of any significance was found, just like before. It may say something along the lines of finally admitting that they cannot identify certain cases with absolute certainty but that due to the nature of what...

Gene, "The Air Force investigated UFOs in the 1950s and 60s and determined that there are no UFOs.."" blah blah blah. More of the same. Nothing to see here. All of the heightened excitement of late will lead to a tremendous disappointment. I really, really want to believe -- still. But, it...

I don’t mean to suggest I went home, read Project Beta, and then put it down and decided I don’t believe in UFOs any more. But after so many years ago when UFOs interested me, to now, any time I hear about an old case that used to excite me (like this one) all I can do is think about poor Paul...

Is there any reason to believe that some fuckery is afoot in this case? The Canadian military is all over it. Your buddy Greg Bishop's book really ruined UFOs for me. I now think they're total fiction, especially with so much military involvement.

Once again, sound advice from the wise old sage, Mr. Sagan. Why oh why didn't I listen to him when I was younger? Probably the whole of Ufology is as true as Von Daniken's book. I know of no single case anymore that is not riddled with dismissible pseudo-evidence.

Wow, Tom Delonge is full of shit. The UFO liars are getting worse and worse. So difficult to take anything UFO related seriously. Seems like it's all very bullshitty. All of it.