Search results

  1. M

    June 28 2009... Nancy Talbot

    Thanks for the thoughts. Ms. Talbot should have been better prepared to field questions on her photographs,and to explain her conclusions. However I extend her the same right to be wrong on occasion,or even give a bad interview, that I would the hosts or anyone else. And her credibility is at...
  2. M

    June 28 2009... Nancy Talbot

    NO, what you are ,David, is an uppity techie,who confuses technology with science. I don't have any need to investigate your credentials- you tell us endlessly and repetitively about what an expert you are.The worst professionals are usually those who brag most about their credentials,and some...
  3. M

    June 28 2009... Nancy Talbot

    Nice thoughts,appreciate the reflections on MUFON past, but that was a long time ago and has nothing to do with the current MUFON. And,with respect,please do tell me,where is the UFO field going so fast? I think you mistake technological improvements with progress in understanding the phenomena...
  4. M

    June 28 2009... Nancy Talbot

    Sorry to get back a bit late-holiday obligations. I do hope you are correct and that this is the extent of the objections. That was not my impression. I do wonder,if I may be allowed to speculate, if a similar story had been told by either host,or by Redfern,Vaeni,Kimball or the other regulars...
  5. M

    June 28 2009... Nancy Talbot

    David- Your defensive,totally irrational(and arrogant) reply complete with expletives is exactly what causes you to lose credibility with me. If you read my response, I did not say "don't ask the hard questions(though the moisture content question is trivial). Ask them in a way that offers the...
  6. M

    June 28 2009... Nancy Talbot

    Having read now pages and pages of character assasination of the most inane and juvenile sort from the Gene and David groupies,a few things come to mind. I have read Nancy T. and the BLT researchers crop circle research for a number of years.It is not without flaws,but it is real...
  7. M

    Credible vs. Clown list needed

    I think Paul's List is generally right on, but I have noticed he tends to overlook the contributions of field workers in favor of compilers/theoreticians. The three best UFOlogists that are not on the list and would be top of the heap would be Walter Webb, Raymond Fowler and Ted Phillips,with...
  8. M

    June 14 Jacobs/Hopkins show

    As far as I know, Budd has pretty much kept that information to himself. He believes it is necessary to do so to check the authenticity of claims about symbols seen by other abductees. I see his point but at some point, soon, I hope he will share it ,as it can be most persuasive if there are...
  9. M

    June 14 Jacobs/Hopkins show

    As far as I know, Budd has pretty much kept that information to himself. He believes it is necessary to do so to check the authenticity of claims about symbols seen by other abductees. I see his point but at some point, soon, I hope he will share it ,as it can be most persuasive if there are...
  10. M

    June 14 Jacobs/Hopkins show

    From Mr. Bass- A lot of good points have been brought up, and one in particular strikes a chord. I think it is pretty much a given that witnesses come to both these gentlemen with some belief in themselves as possible abductees. I think Eddie Bullard,who has done some interesting work in this...
Back
Top