Search results

Just finished listening. It was pretty interesting. I like how Gene Steinberg asks a question and Brad Steiger would dodge it, it was almost like a sport.

Alright, I agree and disagree with your post in general. Radio waves were theorized first then a working experiment was developed and presto change o radio waves are real. Now how did they do it? Surely they would of had to rework the scientific method because the scientific method is only...

DavidRavenMoon, I don't want to get on your case but I have to, we do know a lot about gravity a lot about physics, an argument from ignorance isn't a valid reason to say noone understands gravity or physics. So, what discovered Radio waves? I strongly disagree with the statement we can't use...

I'm coming right out and typing it out, I was not a fan of this episode; which pains me since I like listening to radio (podcast) shows hosts interviewing other hosts of radio(podcast) shows. I was floored by the logic the guests (Well Mr Eno), I paraphrase: "science is a belief system" "we...

Two things it's a huge array of balloons and listening devices they also stated it in the report they released to the public. Secondly we have eye witness testimonies that were recalled 30 years after the fact. Also the flying saucer described by Jesse Marcell(sp) doesn't sound like a flying...

I haven't read all the post but does she state a episode where you do? I kinda do remember you guys saying something along the lines that he still believes in UFO cases that come out to be frauds or something I don't really remember and I'm probably thinking of someone else.

It's probably me more then anything basically, Michael Horne is the American Spokesmen for Billy Meier where Nancy is the American Spokesmen for Robert Van.

Good show, kinda liked the first 30minutes of it and Jim was good guest. I have to say tho I don't think spectral analysis is very good on a photograph or video.

It would seem that Nancy Talbot is Micheal Horne's to Robert's Billy Meier. Oh the subject of Crop circles while there has been some study on the physical effects that's place on soil. I noticed there's only seems to be a Correlation of the circles with the hypotheses. This subject just makes...

My bet would be is she would just blow it off as the usual "debunkers don't know him like I know him." Crap she was spitting out during the show.

It's pretty simple really, if remote viewing works to the point the guy was talking about. The people that left the stargate(can't remember it's name) project, would of started up schools to promote remote viewing.

I think some episodes needs a word of the day. I feel Assumption would work with this one. Eg Cattle horribly mutilated must mean demons or Giants from Nibiru(sp). Nothing else can explain that right? right?

Sounds pretty cynical there David I mean "talking monkeys"?

And yet they fooled a ufologist and a "creditable" eye witness (The pilot and his family). It puts it into perspective that maybe people should really double check what they see.

It's a great parable on skeptical thinking.

Sure he did, I mean if he had evidence and did nothing (Ranting with a bull horn isn't). He should be questioned on his knowledge.

Well if you mean reads as in quote mines or misquotes. then yes he does read documents. All he does is throw mud with, Throw enough mud you may get mud on something, in Alex's case a speck.

I was thinking that but I decided to bite anyways :D

Brilliant in bringing the eye rolling and curtain of laughter. That alot sense nonsense! Intelligent design problems? You can't be talking about the U.K right? Because that's a rising problem there. So science lost credibility because the US hasn't disclose it's ufo files?

I go to youtube and watch clips of a CNN panel talking about Obama's inauguration(sic) when I want to research the US government's involvement with ufo's. My whole issue is that Bassett and his cronies will only be happy if a super secret shadow Government, stands up and says yes you are right...