Search results

Here we go again. Of course I forgive you. I'm not even slightly offended when someone calls bullshit on me. I rather like it because it gives me a wonderful chance to state my case. Again. In this case you are using a common reduction into absurdity fallacy. My claim is I have no sacred cows...

The Paracast does many different kinds of shows. Evidence shows, personal experience shows, book plug shows, roundtable sessions about the state of ufology shows, spooky ghost story shows, belief shows etc. etc. It can take different postures depending on the show. A take no bullshit...

I missed this post earlier and would like to comment. I listened too. I found it interesting. He told of a certain miracle that is going to happen within a year or so. May 2011 if I recall correctly. The test here of course is if it happens. If it does not happen I can say with certainty he...

In battle, the chinks in the armor are all that matter. It is through a chink that the arrow that kills you will get in.

I have said it before, and I'll say it again. And again. "considering the source" is a great fallacy. You should not do that. It's all about the evidence. Full stop. Once you place importance on the source equal to or above the actual evidence you end up running yourself off the deep end...

Reasonable points yes. Unexplained does not mean unexplainable. Every event has an explanation. However that does not mean the explanation is necessarily mundane. Every possible explanation needs to be carefully falsified. Even simple ones. Occam's Razor is probably the most misunderstood and...

Mysterious, strange, anomaly, unexplained, certainly. But aircraft or spaceship is seriously jumping the gun.

Hey, I resemble that remark. :)I'm actually not an uberskeptic. I believe in the reality of the UFO phenomenon. I'm just seriously bugged by certain things in UFOlogy. Compared to the animal pictures these ones are more compelling. I'm no expert in photo analysis so I can't comment on...

Horse hockey. It is obvious, but not for the reasons you say. You know that old saying "consider the source"? It is a fallacy. Evidence will stand by itself if it is the truth. It doesn't matter what anyone says about the person presenting it. Your defence of him would carry real weight...

To be fair lance, his response to me did prompt me to look into things further. In doing so I learned a few things. I know more now than I did before but I didn't find anything that backs up his claims. He told me to google, and google I did. He should have explained things himself...

Hence my continued confusion. I found this:Magnetoplasmadynamic thruster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This may be what he is actually talking about, because he was taliking about plasma flow, but then again I can't be sure. This is really very high level stuff, not high school...

Quoting this to show what realprejudice looks like. :D I thought I was being confrontational not really rude. I was hoping for a response along the line of "stphrz, you are not being baffled with bull, here's why..." I was actually hoping to be made to eat my words and get taught something in...

Such evidence would certainly be a slam dunk. Game. Set. Match. There should be consensus among the scientific community that UFOs are real. Why isn't there?

What does it mean then? Motion picture film can be converted to a format viewable on a computer and posted. This is done all the time. So can still frames. V:shy:V

Are these your words? Do you understand what this means? Is this video available to be viewed? BTW Mr. Stanford's response was very very revealing. Thank you.

All I'm getting from your posts here is that I'm just too dumb to understand. I've asked some questions and gotten nothing but "lol, dumbass" as a response. Thanks a lot dude.

What was the name of the plasma physicist who commented on the audio? What was the magnetometer measuring? The magnetic field in the general area of the encounter? The magnetic field generated by only the objects? Both? What? How was the section of time elapsed imagiing synced up with the...

Hm. I have to reserve judgement here. I don't understand exactly what it is I am looking at. I don't understand why the outlined sections of the instrument readout are significant. The red fuzzy trail doesn't tell me much either. I'm going to do some google searching to try to educate...

Is it possible to have him on the show again sometime soon? You could bring this stuff up with him then.

Oh, you were being sarcastic and I misunderstood? Sorry. Boy is my face red:mad:. You see I just noticed I recently got a nice new red tag under my name, so I figure I need to fly off the handle and bite people's heads off at the slightest provocation. I have a reputation to uphold you know. ;)