Search results

It does just smack of CGI fakery, and sometimes you just have to follow your gut instinct IF the only thing in existence is the video. If there are no secondary witnesses, no additional footage to examine and cross reference, it might be nearly impossible to detect the footage as a fraud. This...

I wouldn't say anything ultra sharp and clear is fake. I will say the video that the person posted and asked about is fake. But yes, this phenomena, perhaps by nature, is very elusive.

Totally CGI. You just have to work in 3D and in video to understand how easy it is to create something like that. However, explaining it is a bit tougher. Sort of like me asking you to explain the difference in taste between one fish or another, to someone who has never had fish. Of course you...

Sounds about right.

No one suggested the photographer was a hoaxer. However, I think it is pretty likely what he photographed or filmed was nothing more than a balloon with a string attached to it.

I don't know how anyone can see anything other than a birthday balloon...

Yet, when companies use capitalism to examine this topic via private industry, the critics claim this is all a ploy by the government to escape FOIA requests. So you can't win. People are already critical of Space X, Virgin, Bigelow Aerospace, and others, for trying to use free market principles...

I haven't examined all your footage, but the "shape changing" you see is often times just a byproduct of going past the optical range with your zoom, and into the digital part of the zoom, which is just enlarging pixels. Because of the distance, coupled with the digital zoom, you start to get...

Unless the object appears to be under intelligent control making miraculous maneuvers, I tend to just click next. The object in these videos can be anything. It is just a blob in the sky, barely moving. Probably a balloon of some kind.

Would you share with us some experiences, and welcome.

What ever happened to Ward?!?!

Totally fair position.

Phil Imbrogno was speaking at UFO conferences, writing books and peddling a fake bio. This guy is doing nothing close to that, he asked for a few recommendations about disclosure. Get a hold of yourself.

Let's not get side tracked. No one should feel compelled to provide any user their personal contact information. The guy who started this thread stated he is looking into the side-effects of disclosure (or something to the effect) before requesting reading suggestions. Just because he mentioned...

You missed my point...Why does he have to disclose his personal contact information to YOU? What makes YOU the person he needs to contact. I find myself pretty reasonable and don't have any problem with what this person has posted or asked. On the contrary, I don't think it's reasonable that he...

What makes you so special? Why would he need to send you his personal contact information? He is simply asking for specific literature that might be helpful to him. Who cares who he is. The worst case scenario is that he is a total fraud....however, I still don't see how providing him a few...

I tried to google some of the professors he said he worked under but could not find any, namely, "Dr. Katz" at the University of Michigan. Dr. Fred Bell & Pyradyne Bell claims he worked on all of the lunar modulars, yet, I can't find a single photo of him near one, or even at NASA.

No more research needs to be dedicated to this fraud. Everything he claims is utter BS. A child could watch his videos and immediately recognize the bad acting and fake props.

I think we need to create propulsion system that generates energy on the basis of the number of words Morrison writes on this forum! Almost free energy! ;)

That's like saying someone is talented for taking candy from a baby. This field is one of the easiest to ridicule and look absurd.