Search results

[FONT=Verdana][SIZE=2] According to the results of a one-time questionnaire-based statistical survey published by the University of Illinois, with 3146 individuals completing the survey, 97% of the actively publishing climate scientists (as opposed to the scientists who are not publishing...

Big Oil is not neccesarily -all- oil Bob, nor is Shell a part of the American Petroleum Lobby. And as you think about which nation Shell does claim as home, maybe you can figure out why they might not support/finance AGW denialism ala Exxon. As a matter of fact, the answer may tell you why...

The climate denial industry is out to dupe the public. And it's working Think environmentalists are stooges? You're the unwitting recruit of a hugely powerful oil lobby – I've got the proof George Monbiot Guardian.co.uk, Monday 7 December 2009 20.00 GMT...

Hmmm...lets see. The "theory" is "unproven" to "critics" because they: Use conspiracy theory in attempts to discredit the science. Employ selectivity (cherry-picking) when choosing data to support their positions Site fake experts, almost always associated with the petroleum industry...

Pentagon to rank global warming as destabilising force US defence review says military planners should factor climate change into long-term strategy The Pentagon will for the first time rank global warming as a destabilising force, adding fuel to conflict and putting US troops at risk around...

What is Denialism Hello Scienceblogs Hello and welcome to denialism blog. Here we will discuss the problem of denialists, their standard arguing techniques, how to identify denialists and/or cranks, and discuss topics of general interest such as skepticism, medicine, law and science...

Umm....no, I'm not "missing the point". But perhaps you are. This thread started out as a simple exercise in trying to show the science behind the overwhelming scientific consensus that the climate is changing and that carbon is key to that change. It quickly turned into something else once the...

State of the Climate Global Analysis Annual 2009 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center Global Highlights Global land and ocean annual surface temperatures through December tied with 2006 as the fifth warmest on record, at 0.56°C (1.01°F)...

« Global Warming and Climate Change: Phrases of the decade CRU email theft perspectives » Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ Nov 21st, 2009 by...

The CRU hack Filed under: Climate Science — group @ 20 November 2009 As many of you will be aware, a large number of emails from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia webmail server were hacked recently (Despite...

Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air - How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Change -. PDF (The Union of Concerned Scientist - January 2007) "ExxonMobil has manufactured uncertainty about the human causes of global warming just as tobacco companies denied their...

Exxon to cut funding to climate change denial groups David Adam guardian.co.uk...

http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~karin/140/articles/MethaneHydrates.pdf DOE Meeting Summary by Alvia Gaskill http://www.global-warming-geo-engineering.org/DOE-Meeting/Catastrophic- Methane-Hydrate-Release/ag14.html Catastrophic Methane Hydrate Release Mitigation This topic falls under the...

Arctic permafrost leaking methane at record levels, figures show Experts say methane emissions from the Arctic have risen by almost one-third in just five years, and that sharply rising temperatures are to blame http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/14/arctic-permafrost-methane...

This guy, Warren, is also a former Exxon project engineer. Is there anything that you offer here that -doesn't- have Exxon's fingerprints on it somewhere in the background? The "house of cards" falls only in your imagination friend. If you read the piece, nowhere is warming denied nor are...

I am actually intent on demolishing your church Bob. Just a heads up. I do find it interesting that out of the whole of science - Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Climatology, etc etc, and all that's been scientifically proven, science without doubt or question, that some will seize on the actions...

Thanks Bob. So let's take a look for a moment at the paper Schuyler refers us to. First, a quick Wiki glance at the "Science and Public Policy Institute" tells us right of the bat that: "The Science and Public Policy Institute is not connected to the former Center for Science and Public...

I hope you won't mind link to your mystery document here Bob. I need to sharpen my claws. For the record Bob, I'm just warming up. You might even say that I haven't even started yet, as I've really just been laying out preliminary groundwork. I'm sorry you saw yourself -personally- attacked...

So we are discussing the scientific study of Ice Core. Pixelsmith has attempted to discredit this science by providing us with a missive from Zbigniew Jaworowski. I won't bother trying to point out that he is not a climate scientist nor does he specialize in Ice Core science. Rather, here is a...

These statements are not in dispute. It's understanding causal mechanisms that's important here. It is a given that the atmosphere is composed of gases and that levels of those gases fluctuate due to natural ebbs and flows. That said, I'd like to focus on the following for the sake of this...