Search results

Neither. You asked what are you talking about when someone said religious affiliation. I answered.

Jacob and Esau. Nuff said.

Same here. Don's voice is very loud and has a reverb. Guests/callers are much lower volume. Turn up to listen to guest, then Don's voice wakes everyone in the house up when it comes back on. Love the shows though.

Here, just thought I would provide some imagery to promote the proper ambiance for this forum...

OK, let's do that. Please delineate the research path that led Hoagland to believe a spiral formation above Norway was caused by a hidden enclave of Nazi scientists hiding on the moon, exercising control over the governments of earth. Go ahead. You have the floor. Oh, and did anyone else...

Jonah, et al., I think it is pretty obvious by now nobody here is going to change the minds of those opposing their views on this subject. I was typing a rebuttal to Jonah's latest post, listing growing glaciers and articles about the ice sheet thickening in Antarctica and thought, "Why am I...

Well Schuyler, perhaps this is a part of what that is about... India forms new climate change body - Telegraph I suspect the tip of the iceberg (pardon the pun). What a great quote from that article: “There is a fine line between climate science and climate evangelism. I am for...

What in God's name are you talking about, blowfish? Please don't mention The Paracast and C2C in the same paragraph again, it is demeaning. And, I did listen to the Hoagland part of the C2C show. How in hell's bathroom can you say great show when he said the Norway spiral was caused by a...

Hey, now that is pretty catchy. Mars arse. And, what about the Valles Marineris, is it opposite "the face"? ;)

Here we go again. Just because someone does not think that we are artificially heating the planet, we are automatically against pollution controls for all other reasons. Geezus, it never ends. ---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ---------- You...

That is patently ridiculous. There is plenty of scientific research posted already in this forum that shows whatever warming is occurring is within normal patterns and nothing to be alarmed about. You just refuse to acknowledge it and keep posting the same old pre-Climategate lies and...

Be sure to read all the comments below that article. Some of them are great.

Official Global Warming Alarmist garb

Oh how gauche of them, I concur. Do pass the crumpets, fellow elitist, so we way savor them whilst we make sport of more simpletons. [Insert chortle]

With all Jonah's babbling about "Big Oil" and insinuations of corporations paying to fuel the "skeptics", in truth, the global warming cult is the one looking after their own self-interest first with a higher priority on funding (from Big Oil, mind you) than being factual in their statements...

Schuyler, thank you for that article. Two passages from that article say it all...

I was at work and remember that day very well. We watched it on a small TV in the office. Painful memory.

Well, at least you admit you are losing this debate. That is a start. When you realize that it is not a "dupe" but the truth that is winning, then the rainbow appears.

Oh my. More chicanery in the Global Warming community. Stay tuned. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/leaked-emails-climate-jones-chinese http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/dispute-weather-fraud Oh and a strike against those (not naming names, just glancing at...

It is a forum. A forum was designed specifically for posting comments and discussion.