Search results

You're a believer. That's a typical response. Meanwhile they will get rich off of this and you won't.

That reminds me of the X-Files episode with the fake aliens that were made out of a combination of animal and plant. It was the episode where the alien was found encased in ice and Mulder thought it was the real deal but Scully realized it was fake.

I'm not sure. Try UFO Conjecturers or Kevin Randles' blog.

You are preaching to the choir. I was talking about artifical wombs YEARS ago. Also, I've speculated that cattle mutilation may be partly due to get tissue to use in creation of the beings or at least the artificial wombs.

I'm not getting into a debate on the Alien Autopsy film from the 90s. The matter is clearly settled that it's a hoax. So you can believe what you want to believe at this point. However, I do not think what we are dealing with is a Neumann Probe. A Neumann Probe is still just a machine at the...

Mike, That's all been long debunked. That is for the Alien Autopsy stuff. However, years ago back on UFO Updates, I posted a piece on "How to create a gray alien", where I speculate that fetuses where indeed "sped up" growth-rate-wise by some means to create a being that was stuck with infant...

No and when you quote someone make sure to quote them properly because I did not write "It was taken...". Instead I wrote, "Some are saying it was taken....." That part comes from various blog comments.

Made up what? Tom Carey and Don Schmitt were the last big Roswell researchers. Their credibility is now destroyed.

Heads are going to roll! A German team took a screen grab of the slides in the trailer of the documentary and blew them up and enhanced them, revealing the slides. Google Translate Despite being told time and again that the creature in the slides wasn't a deformed human and wasn't a mummy, it...

Heard this on a podcast and I completely believe it: These people are carnies. If you buy a ticket (or pay to live stream) you are a rube. I'm not giving a dime of my money to hungry con artists. As it stands now, assuming they sell out of the 10,000 seats available, they will make millions...

1. I don't know if she was murdered or not. 2. The water was so hot it burned skin off of her back. 3. She was found face down but no mention of burns to her face or front of her body. This suggests the body was, in the very least, moved. It's impossible to get burns on just your back if you...

I think the point you are missing is you can't prove you are conscious. Nobody can. So how can we deny something to machines when we can't even establish what it is?

Do you have a real consciousness, a real mind? Or is your belief that you are conscious merely an illusion brought about by the own complexity of billions of neurons interacting?

Just a friendly reminder that nobody has ever implied that machines have now surpassed, nor are even equal to, human beings. Sorry, I've had problems before with people putting words into my mouth in this forum. so just so everyone knows. This is a milestone and it hasn't bee accomplished in 64...

Yes it is. And in time it will only grow, as computers advance. There will be day in the future where machines will fool the overwhelming majority of people into thinking they were interacting with a human.

There is always going to be naysayers. There will always be a percentage of humans who refuse to acknowledge that machines could be their equals, let alone surpass humans. In all of the science fiction scenarios, these people tend to be the cause of the machine revolt.

The standard is not whether or not it fools you. The standard is if it fools at minimum, 30% of the participants in the study.

No. Consciousness, Intelligence, these are all things that we can't prove each other possesses. Instead, all we do is we ASSUME that if something behaves in an intelligent manner then it is intelligent/conscious. So, when machines evolve to the point where they fool us into thinking they are...

The super computer's name is Eugene. It is the first machine in the world to have passed the Turing Test. According to the Turing Test, if a machine can fool 30% of people into thinking it is a human being then it passes the test and is considered to be intelligent/conscious. Eugene fooled 33%...

I know what scientists say. I know that from what little surveys there are that only a little over half of scientists believe in AGW. I know that the 97% figure is a myth and it just gets repeated over and over again, all the way up to NASA and Obama. Doesn't make it right. And it's not right.