Search results

Paul Kimball has suggested that "the call is coming from within the house", meaning that someone on the Dream Team is responsible for the hacking and has been tricking the other members in the hopes that it would stir up publicity.

The director of investigations at MUFON believes the slides are fake. The Other Side of Truth: Steve Hudgeons of MUFON on the "Roswell Slides"

I would say just the opposite. The hacker probably go tired of the secrecy and likely wanted to get the slides and leak them to the public. Many groups like anonymous have similar views such as this. I would venture to say that the hacker's perception was that the dream team were hoarding this...

How is such statement important?

Assuming that the crash was extraterrestrial and going off of the testimony, I doubt there would have been any sign of impact. The debris on the Foster ranch did not penetrate the ground and appeared to have broken up in the air and then rained down from the sky. If there was a second crash site...

I clarified that comment but it's been lost in the pages in this thread. Roswell research is dead despite whether or not there is any truth to the case. There's numerous persons who have researched Roswell but there's only 4 big public faces. Those would be Stanton Friedman, Kevin Randle...

I doesn't work that way, Mike. If I believe it's a mummified child I don't have to prove it. It's the person who claims it's extraordinary who has to prove the case.

The default position is that it's not an alien until it is proven to be an alien. However, it can't ever be proven to be alien and this it will always remain as "not alien".

It's polarizing. It immediately causes people to drop their masks and reveal who they are, "True Believer", "Skeptic", "Debunker", etc.

No. And I've been trying to get you understand this. The default position is that it's not an alien until proof can be provided.

Yeah, that doesn't mean what you think it means, just so you know. People brainstorming various naturally easy explanations will never account for proof that the slides are of an alien.

Logically, we are to be swayed by proof/evidence and nothing else. Otherwise we arrive in "True Believer" territory. True Believerism is like a cult.

It was a trick question. A picture isn't proof. Just like with Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster, as well as UFOs, pictures aren't proof. Any expert who looked at the pictures would have told them they would have had to see the actual specimen before giving a professional opinion.

Do you think it's possible to prove that a being in a picture is a genuine alien? If so, how could this be accomplished?

Thanks for your opinions, True Believer. However, the way it works is that nobody is required to prove it's not an alien being. We don't have to prove it's a mummified child or prove that it's a dummy or anything else. If they can't prove it's an alien the case is over with. Hint: They can't...

It went right over your head. If what I said is zilch then so is what Adam wrote. Because we don't know that as fact.

Criticism does not require proof. The burden of proof lies on the person making the positive claim, i.e. if you claim it's an alien you have to prove it. In this case proving such is impossible. There's no way they can ever prove that its an alien. This thing was doomed from the start.

That's what Adam says. However, for all we know Tom and Don were persuaded when the right sum of $$$ was waved in front of their faces. I've already stated this before in this thread. An expert can not give an opinion that a being in a picture is "non-human". They would have to see the actual...

You are a true believer, Mike. And I did not contradict myself. You ignore or excuse all the warning signs this is a scam.

I don't know of anyone who continues to insist that the slides are faked or hoaxed. I think most would agree that they do indeed date from the 1947 era. The problem is that most people seem convinced that what is on the slides is human remains, probably a mummified child. Adam Dew conveniently...