Search results

😄 It could not have been a MOGUL balloon and was not. The documentation proves #4 was cancelled, and descriptions of witnesses, including the base intel officer, clearly point to something "not of this earth" as Marcel put it. ETI is "unproven to exist" to laymen; it's highly naive to assume...

Has anyone else here read the book? The problem is, all known witnesses are now deceased. KDR certainly doesn't doubt there's plenty more evidence, in government hands. In his previous work, he said in effect the case is at a dead end until the government finally releases what it has. "But...

What was displayed in Ramery's office was junk as the real material went to WPAFB. No, the mundane was used as an "explanation" for any alien craft. As I said before flight number 4 was cancelled. The others are accounted for. A base intel officer couldn't tell the difference between...

As I wrote before, KDR exhaustively investigated all the alternatives. The skeptics long ago settled on mogul precisely because documentation showed that everything else was impossible. Ultimately mogul went the same way, as documentation showed it could not have been responsible. People should...

Flight #4 was supposedly the one (as all the others are accounted for) but as the documentation shows, it was cancelled. KDR mentioned anothrer reason it couldn't have been 4: it was scheduled for mid June but Brazel didn't see the mess on the ranch until July. Inasmuch as it interfered with...

Witnesses like Bill Brazel stated government personnel took what they had found. It makes no sense to demand "extraordinary proof" if the government took it and won't reveal it. Occasionally they also happen in association with UFO/humanoid encounters. Nobody ever did that, although, as KDR...

It would be nice if the proof taken by government or military people were revealed…. UFOlogy or the ETH, is not based solely on witness testimony. Many cases are supported by physical evidence--landing marks, damage, injuries etc. Try reading KDR's books or his blog… There was only one way...

When there is no terrestrial explanation for a technical phenomenon--as has been repeatedly shown with regard to Roswell--and the phenomenon includes reports of humanoid or nonhuman beings, as well as technology, ET is the only reasonable explanation.

Witness testimony may not be conclusive proof but it is evidence. Many times KDR rejected UFO cases or certain reports because he didn't find them credible, and he has investigated Roswell more exhaustively than any other case.

So you're completely unfamiliar with Roswell witness testimony and that of others who noted the government took e.g. film. They are unproven to laymen; you can't assume the government, which took so much evidence, has no definitive proof…Btw we are "space aliens"--from the perspective of the...

But the phenomenon does want to be perceived as a threat. There have been "bad' incidents since 1953, or 1948--Mantell.

No evidence that laymen are (fully) aware of…As KDR notes in his latest book on Roswell, there is no known, credible explanation other than ET, in which case the government, which confiscated the evidence, knows plenty…Even the public has access to reports e.g. Socorro, in which the evidence for...

Of course, even if the objects were ET, they have to say that as it's the public position.

It's interesting that General VanHerck doesn't "rule out space aliens or anything." Actually I think they have a very good idea what they're shooting at, and it's all planned in advance to maintain a facade of government-alien hostility.

Look at Malmstrom and similar cases, and that's just one aspect of it.

In that case it probably wouldn't be habitable. In fact, actual communication and behavior of the phenomenon appears intended to emphasize a rift, even open hostility, between earthly governments and ETs.

Lol, must be a charlatan like Brandenburg or Hoagland. Mars is a paradise alright, for those who like -100 F or lower temps and deadly radiation. We'll get to Mars, in pursuit of more realistic objectives.

The energy source would be internal planetary heat. The sun is at best irrelevant. No Martian civilization was ever possible. Essentially present conditions have persisted since the end of the Noachian. Any civilization or race incapable of living on the surface would be very unlikely to...

Probably just rubble.

What do you think they are?