Search results

No, Spookie. From what you describe, I don't think it was any type of military drone that we have. Thanks again for the additional description.

Regarding the video of Col. Korff.: Warning! Highly intelligent schizophrenic.

Spookie, thanks for the great story. Your description is very clear. If you could, would you be able to recall a few extra details for me. You say there was light emanating around the ball; could you be a bit specific? Was it a glow around the sphere? Any color to it? Any more information about...

Not to sound judgemental or self-congradulatory, I think the tone of the debates on this thread and forum, overall, is very high.

S.R.L., you gotta understand, this is a forum, not necessarily a university-level setting. Debates like this, while very interesting, often evoke soft responses to points because not everyone feels comfortable precisely outlining their viewpoints in very sharp focus all of the time.

Reading this stuff makes me think this Korff guy has serious psychological issues. SERIOUS issues. Seriously, I've seen some of his Billy Meier material and he sounded sane at the time. Something has happened in the meantime because it looks like he really believes people are supposed to be...

Looking at this 'Brazil' video in more detail, I noted that something strange happens at 00:39 sec. Before everyone yells 'aha! Hoax!', note the shadowing on the clouds has changed. I suspect whatever else is going on, something caused the camera to change its exposure for a brief period of...

I cannot say why the video begins where it does or ends where it does, however the endpoints of this Brazil video do not strike me as particularly odd. That aside, I fully agree with the need to maintain maximum skepticism concerning any video portraying strange events. However, that skepticism...

True entropy also results from lack of analysis.

From the video, it's obvious, to me, that they've seen an object of interest before the video has started. They then pull off to the side of the road and start to try to search for and locate the object with their video camera.

Admitted hoax by a very questionable hoaxer who conveniently refuses to provide details on how he hoaxed it. As for Brazil, instead of guessing what's on the video, why not take a look first, then comment on it?

To me, he does not sound like someone grinding an axe with his arguments. But, I take your spin on it. I also note that you are implicitly separating the Jerusalem, Utah, and now, Brazil videos. I think that is a mistake. There are common elements.

Further regarding all this, I found a very interesting comment left by an individual on the Discovery News article re the Jerusalem videos. I reproduced it in the 'New Utah footage' thread. It's a little long, so I won't repeat it here. Note the claim at the end of the comment. ---------- Post...

I'm quoting a comment left on the Discovery News' article that attempts to debunk the Jerusalem UFO videos. It's a little long, but you can skip to its end for the salient point: Fred Kra Well, it's clear that nobody involved with this article knows Jerusalem. And other things. That's okay...

Ok. If it's fake it's fake. I find there are problems with this line of reasoning, but still let's keep it real.

Angelo, what can I say? It does not look like a fake to me. And there are a lot of reasons why. Like I've been saying, if this is all a hoax, it's a doozie.

Things are getting real interesting.

If quantum physics is anything to go by, then the observer is essential for reality and our 3D + time universe. And by observer, that means us, or other sentient beings. My interpretation of this is that, for now, conciousnesss is unique and distinct from matter. Whether artificially...

If quantum physics is anything to go by, then the observer is essential for reality and our 3D + time universe. And by observer, that means us, or other sentient beings. My interpretation of this is that, for now, conciousnesss is unique and distinct from matter. Whether...

I believe James stated during the show that "that there is no evidence whatsoever that E.T. came to visit the planet earth in any of his cases during his tenure". I think it's important to distinguish that from him saying that there is no evidence whatsoever for E.T. in any case he has seen.