Search results

Kieran, I think you are approaching this question of why 'not don't the aliens reveal themselves' from a very human-centric point of view. I think your viewpoint makes many implicit assumptions that are not necessarily valid. The most obvious implicit assumption is that the 'E.T.' think like us...

I looked at the video in more detail. Lighting appears correct. Note the dome is lit up during the flash at 0:48 sec. Both the golden dome and building are lit. Difficult effect (though not impossible) to fake. Camera follows UFO after the flashes and it is briefly visible in upper right of...

It's difficult to estimate sizes just based on viewing videos, but I'd say the UFO objects are roughly same size or a bit bigger in the daylight video. Again, I'm not that surprised of the situation regarding witnesses. I think for a lot of people actively seeking publicity by claiming they've...

Mike, you bring up good points, however I find the reactions of the observers plausible. The shout seems due to the flashes, which would be visible to the naked eye. It is not surprising the witnesses are startled. Also, there is a very interesting detail at ~0:48 sec, near the end of the video...

Here is another Temple Mount UFO video, dated March 2011. Daylight this time. www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeDskhnmBdg& I don't know. I'd have to say it would be pretty hard to dismiss as a fake, but then I have not done any or seen any analysis of the video.

Nice. Looks like some kind of an electrical discharge to me (not regular lightning). [expansion] Actually, somebody suggested 'sprite' and I agree. I think the effect is basically a plasma discharge along an ionized trail left by cosmic rays crashing through the atmosphere. The clouds are the...

Ah yes, David Rudiak's analysis. I had not seen the updated material before. From what I have read, his analysis is thourough and consistent. He paints more detail in with Martin's analysis. I found the 3D fly-over from the UFO's perspective very interesting. It appears to confirm intelligent...

Unless I am missing something, the 'equipment' Martin J. Powell used is just a PC, some video software, 3D modelling tools and maybe a BASIC compiler. Of course, it's not the equipment but the person behind it that is important :). Personally, I find part 3 of Martin's analysis very interesting...

And this in no way invalidates the previous modelling/data. Again, this is another strawman argument to attack the original concept. These types of arguments seem to be very common these days, I see them being used here against greenhouse effect modelling, the same way I see them being used...

No, incorrect. Again, you are not understanding the principle of the CO2[gas phase]/CO2[aqueous phase] equilibrium properly. The solar constant (not really a constant), is accounted for in the modelling ---------- Post added at 12:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:35 PM ----------...

From the graph, it looks to me like statistically significant rise in temperature fluctuations towards year 2000 of about 0.5 deg. C. Meaning more temperature variability, all consistent with an overall temperature rise. Higher temperature variation is a consequemce of higher overall...

But it is not a CO2 generator! If anything it is a huge buffer and net absorber of CO2. As for the big hot ball of gas in the sky, what about it?

Ooh...I'm starting to get a headache... Heat 'flows' so as to redistribute itself and increase the entropy of a system. Hot air 'rises' because its density is lower than cold air and it experiences buoyancy. All this means is that convection currents are set up in the atmosphere. All this has no...

This is simplistic. It depends which volcano you are talking about and has nothing to do with the extra CO2 we (mankind) are adding. The ocean releasing CO2 is not a valid argument. The oceans are in equilibrium with respect to dissolved CO2 and CO2 atmospheric partial pressure. The oceans do...

I will not argue conspiracies with you, so please do not use them as arguments. Believe me, conspiracy theories make all your other arguments, however factual they may be, look weak. For all I know, you might be part of a conspiracy on the part of the oil companies and their reptilian overlords...

I find your contention not credible. Detailed quantitative computer modelling goes against your argument, as do environmental temperature measurements across the globe. You know the greenhouse effect is a real physical phenomenon and yet you implicitly assume it is not a significant part of...

Here is the full version of that mysterious last video (6th?) purportedly showing the 'Jerusalem UFO' up close. This was supposedly given to Eligael (one of the videographers of the original videos), who refuses to vouch for its authenticity. www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uvw8qqZUw8I don't have...

Oh Geez, you guys pushed the pixelsmith-climate thingie. I knew it when I saw the words CO2, Al Gore, and pixelsmith 3 pages ago. @Pixelsmith, give it up. Carbon dioxide + water vapor as an amplifier do indeed contribute significantly to the greenhouse effect on our planet. The greenhouse...

I always wondered if these poltergeists could be made to haunt a generator. Instead of moving chairs and furniture around, slamming doors, flipping light switches, throwing dishes, and generally making a nuissance of themselves, put them to work! Here's the plan. Install a ~1 kilowatt...

Hmmm. Bait. I wonder who's gonna bite.