Search results

THE Paranormal Power Couple

Good analogy for us technically less sophisticated, Ron. What still doesn't compute when I apply that consideration while studying the image is: why, if the pixelation could be producing a rectangularish artifact, why isn't that artifactual limitation causing the smaller objects in the image to...

My check's in the mail--and could I get my secret decoder ring, too?

Damn that Doty guy-he just can't keep a secret!

ARGGHH!

This guy is typical of the old adage, "Science advances one funeral at a time." Rather than tolerate that which cannot fit into their paradigm, they quickly depart from true inquiry into 'safe harbors'. A syllogism can be true and valid, untrue and valid, but it loses all usefulness when it...

Have you heard the term 'crepidarian" or "anticrepidarian?-- more obscure and therefore perhaps a fresher way of describing a debunker.

What about deep underground tunneling?

Hell; why don't we just ask the NSA if we could use their version?

Anticipation, Expectation, Revelation? Or pipe dreams...

You might be thinking of Genesis by W.A.Harbinson

DUh! Didn't you catch my earlier post?

How about a paracast ufo detector app for iphone and htc?

Count me in-Only I'll turn it over when I see you on Christmas Eve...

"Man with giant soapy brush" made me laugh out loud, TO.

As M. Younger once commented regarding the substructure of manipulation by fellow'humans', "You are wrapped up and delivered and you don't even know it..." Looking at American politics and the financial fiasco of the last three decades, I'd say that the people are just beginning to realize...

Actually, TO, I think that PM does include certain characterizations that try to draw attention and link unlinked things to produce a 'moist' environment where the mind registers a new 'thought' or way of thinking about things. The recent abduction 'study' was surely not worthy of the attention...

Well said, Hotkafka. What strikes me, though nothing new, is the sorry state of mind that thinks this flawed bit of half-ass research is 'proof' of anything; and then it gets so much press. The PM managers perhaps?

I see another assumption here. It may be that it is not created 'neurologically, but that is the system ​through which it operates. One could as well say that the eyes are the creator of what's seen, don't you think?