Search results

Readily available answers? With all due respect, I wouldn't take anyone serious who claims to have answers to this 70 year old mystery. We can't even be certain of an ET source behind the phenom. Only thing certain is "something is seen, but a person doesn't know what."

He isn't the guy who, in front of many witnesses, plunged a staff into solid rock? Now that would get my attention. The rest of these so called channel folk, to me they are no different than the contactee's of the 1950's who described space brothers taking the chosen on a tour of great cities...

Ah, Thank you Chris. I'd love to get Bigelow on the show for an honest interview. Maybe we can get Ryan to make this happen : )

regarding Bigelow's like/dislike- didn't he recently pay a certain researcher for file details on abductee's? If so, I never heard the name of the researcher who sold him these files. I really enjoyed the discussion of possible underground cities- and the search for them.

Makes you wonder- if the purpose behind these vehicles is to specifically help advance human technology. Airships to disk- seems we have struggled with implementing anything similar to what has been witnessed/described as saucer propulsion. I am still unsure of the triangle craft being that of...

If the images are recently created hoax, perhaps the museum look would be a good exit set up? People may move on instead of digging further had the placard said "ET crashed disk" I am only repeating my take on what George has posted in this thread. Personally, I don't know what to think as far...

"Why wouldn't they create a model more like ET?" Perhaps to cover their bases as far as total fraud. The "oh it was just old mummy photo- move on" thinking from those who actually paid money for the presentation.

Interesting image if genuine. Reminded me more of a smoke alarm than a stove top.

Dr. O'Connor wrote "Guys, the placard is false, ignore it" He then goes on to suggest the remains should be examined further, saying the placard/San fran as a possible museum location. I am confused- is he trying to say the placard is completely false, or not.

I don't think there is a "legal expert" anywhere that would touch this with a ten foot pole. The subject matter alone, as already mentioned... I believe the phrase has been coined "the giggle factor" for a very good reason.

Roswell has become a brand name that sells. That + Maussan = $ ,with no substance or interesting data to be expected. I have to assume most of those who spent money on this reveal had the money to spend, and couldn't have walked in with high expectations.

Your comparison, using a vehicle sale fraud, is way off. People paid money to see 70 year old slides of what the presenters coined as ET. I do not believe a judge would ever entertain the idea that the audience was duped, or that any kind of illegal fraud was perpetrated. Sure, it's easy for...

April 19th 1943. Chemist Albert Hoffman accidently ingested (spilled) lsd, leading to the first most interesting "bicycle ride home" in human history. Without doing a google search- I know he lived to be a very old man, always advocating the responsible use of "his product" which has destroyed...

Batmmann- If a person went and spent their mortgage payment or kid's college tuition on this event, I can't say I feel much sorry for that person. If I had a lot of money to be pissin away I may have made the trek just because I could afford to "be taken" -Who honestly thought some major reveal...

As far as any kind of refund, or class action lawsuit- I can't see a judge "entertaining" the idea of fraud in this case. Couldn't any good lawyer convince the court the whole display was for entertainment purposes? I have little reason to doubt the placard describes a museum piece, as the image...

50 years later- cold war ended- why not just come out and say chimps, blimps, atom bomb, etc. or whatever secret 1947 technology fell from the sky. Considering it was 50 yrs later ('97) whatever project it may have been would certainly be obsolete.

I'm not sure which is more outrageous- the '97 Air Force announcement of project mogul crash test dummies being mistaken as humanoid creatures- or these dummy slides being passed off as crash test humanoid mummy. Or something like that.

There are those out there who thrive on inserting themselves into dramatic events. Reminds me of the main character in the movie Fight Club, who spends his evenings going to all different types of support groups. Sort of like attending the funeral of an aunt or uncle that no one could get along...

I haven't commented on your analogy- I would never make assumed comments without reading such.

Have you read Hopkin's book "Witnessed?" It would be a lot easier to insert your opinion when or if you take the time to read the material.