Search results

I know. At least that one movie 'Moon' was a good one. That was an excellent show though and through. For those of you interested in the real Apollo 18, there is an anomaly of sorts in the intended landing area that has been the source of much discussion. We have a thread here about that...

Hey Folks, I know after the latest Paracast moon show many of you were left with a bad taste in the mouth and a high-pitched ringing the ears..... so I've decided to give you the tools to prolong your suffering. The following is a video by our favourite Childress - David Hatcher. In this...

Just found out the following: Being in space compromises healing ability. So we can scratch that whole idea about the capsule having healing powers. Also, we can rule out the blood-under the nail as being from decompression, as the return to earth resulted in increased pressure being...

My brother had the same theory for a while earlier tonight. But then I pointed out that that the pictures were taken immediately after the spacewalks. And the capsules operate on a oxygen-gas mixture at less than one atmosphere of pressure (5 pounds/square inch instead of 15 as on the surface...

Yeah, that's an issue. I've read various theories that try to account for it and I am not satisfied by any one in particular. Is there anything that you think has potential to account for this expansion? Any paper you like? Edit: Shit, I think we killed this moon thread.

This guy lunacognita has been investigating Apollo and NASA for years. He's basically a NASA historian who knows more about Apollo than any of us. He says he found evidence that NASA was lying about some hand-injuries the astronauts developed during Apollo 17 And he has proof. Now he doesn't...

We live in exciting times. There is a very good chance that relativity will be proven in our lifetimes. Not just through observations which may or may not be attributable to it's effects, but to the point where I won't be able to say it isn't falsifiable (this is of course contingent on the...

Mike, You cannot go faster than the speed of light. That is silly john lear-style talk. Right? Consensus and all that says it is. Consensus - you can't beat that. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2003/1212einstein.html *Hey, you should go to a site called 'jref forum'...

Nope. Read the report, they couldn't find any signs of frame-dragging until they decided frame-dragging must be what they were seeing in the data. A posteriori : Hey you ever read dingle's question? Some of you guys might like this one - it is a brain buster: ---------- Post added at...

This can be accounted for without using relativity. The papers are all available for download. Also, Gravity probe B didn't detect frame-dragging and LIGO failed to detect the gravity waves you probably believe in. *I understand that I probably won't convince you that time travel is...

Hey guys look, I don't think many of you understand relativity. The number of people who understand it is relatively low. It is easy to pretend to understand it and to go along to get along, but I don't do that. And I hope that if you don't truly understand relativity, you'll admit that. How...

Angelo, I really believe that time cannot be slowed. And that time travel is impossible. But so do men with PhDs who are smarter than I. If you read that link I posted, you'll read some of their work.

Hey Mike, Einstein's theories aren't falsifiable. Relativity is bogus. Gravity lensing is bogus. Time travel isn't possible and you cannot slow time. More here: Einstein Was Wrong - Falsifying Observational Evidence Presented - a knol by Michael Suede I also used to believe in Einstein's...

From the wikipedia article on Red Mercury: The IAEA said that it wasn't real, yet here we have diplomatic cables wherein it is being treated as real. The wiki page on this stuff is quite extensive. Here is more from the wiki:

Hey folks, I sent this to Don earlier but I figured it might be something some of you folks would be interested in. I found it the other day while perusing the leaked diplomatic cables. Some of you may remember there was alot of talk and rumour surrounding Red mercury in the 1990s, but it was...

That happens to me to. It is like a gypsy curse.

What are you implying? That we didn't go? I argue both sides, but I wouldn't use that image as evidence we didn't go. Check the images from that mission, you'll see tire tracks on plenty of them. I doubt they'd screw that up if they faked it.

I can see the tracks. Check your monitor or open it in a viewing program and tinker with the settings. (I have to prop my screen up with pencils to get everything just right)

Could you please expand upon where you think I'm wrong. I agree with what you said so you have effectively confused me. Do you need this sentence to be explained to you? I shall do it anyways... ...You know that rover you posted - that doesn't need a Saturn five to get to the moon. An...

We don't, but we can guesstimate. For example, they didn't have the Saturn ready while they were launching the lunar orbiter probes so if we see something that appears to have a mass greater than the lifting capabilities of the contemporary rockets, then we can suspect that those rockets...