Search results

Guys, This.... ....it is so awesome. I'm trying to find the titty photos, I'll post the links when I find 'em. :cool:

True It will do no good to have the blueprints to a device that can win the war when you don't have the means of production.

Found this and more on ATS : There is actually a whole slew of insults and implications of dishonesty against Mr Hastings and Mr Salas in that thread - here are all of Carlson Jr's posts there: Robert Hastings has a message for UFO non-believers., page 1 And his posts from another thread...

581g The signal came from the direction of Tucanae. A Researcher named Ron Schmidt wrote the astronomer who detected the signal to clarify matters: Here is the chart that the astronomer was using - look what Dr Bathal wrote:

That was a stellar special you did there Don. Thanks for posting it for us.

Hey Ward, I wish you well on your Birthday. Enjoy the day, eh!

Hey Don, Mr. Redfern and yourself sure did a good show tonight. And damn, talk about some strange stuff - this has to be one of the weirdest takes I've heard on the subject matter. *In the theory/story discussed tonight - finding out that religion played the role it did - I came away thinking...

Hey fellas, Check it out - It is what happens when exopolitiks shows up on a decent forum:

You nailed it Ted. The whole exopolitics business is a sham and it does us no good. One of the worst parts about it is how bloody well entrenched it has become, to the point where I think it won't be going away anytime soon. That being said, I'm glad we have folks like you out there in the...

The Internet Is Serious Business.

Check out this - it is that thing on the moon on a t-shirt! The Thing On The Moon Tshirt from Zazzle.com

That makes no sense. Even if an alien craft was imaged, no one could say that humans 'outsmarted the aliens'. One might say that 'an unusual object was imaged', but to go about claiming intellectual superiority is just stupid. Monkeys with Cameras - Proof of their suhpeerioritah...

RCH, I think that is because Don is one of the few people who can tolerate what comes out of the woodwork when using that Footage.

Hey John, What show do you do? And who was in the mental institution? Hoagland?

Americans will like this one: <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uZfRaWAtBVg&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess"...

It would be enjoyable to hear Knapp on the show talking about the old days, and some new stuff too. I like it when shows reminisce about things that are rarely known, or unknown at all (Like George Knapp saying one day that he had the tape of element 115 in a cloud chamber). Plus it would...

I think was an Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon. An 'UAP'.... So now we can talk about it without arguing over the word 'object'. Right?

Is this your way of asking someone else to do your research for you? :)

Hey Archie, I found an image that goes well with something you said earlier: [IMG] This caricature even includes the bloviation we have come to expect from the character on which it is based.

I have yet to issue my final conclusions regarding 9/11. Anyhow, I do agree that the '9/11 truth' does have many suspicious elements. Edit: Why are you calling people delusional fantasists who think that the collapse (s) may have been what it looked like? No planes hit building 7...