Search results

You didn't answer my question: Where are the [three] big bright lights? Even if the lights are off, they should still be visible (especially if they are "big bright lights"). The link you shared is useless...one poster disputed the existence of a strobe light on the belly of the craft and the...

LOL! Now that's funny, it would also be much more interesting than a FT. Ha ha. So on this latter sighting, it's safe to say (?) the lights were in a triangular formation and the shape of the craft itself was not discerned. Any impression of size? I'm merely indulging my...

Fortunately, you don't have to be an expert to look at a picture of an airplane and see where the lights are. I have no desire to just spew things out and hope they fall into the right place. If by being an expert you mean not jumping to irrational conclusions based on non-evidence, then yes...

There is nothing unusual about the B2 Spirit's light configuration, and the configuration certainly does not conform to the "classic" black triangle reports. If anything, the B2's light configuration appears even more diminutive than a typical aircraft, keeping in line with its intended modus...

You didn't say it outright, but you were looking at it from beneath? Could you see the outline of the craft itself or just the lights? I guess I'm asking: were the lights at each point of an enclosing silhouette or were the lights themselves arranged in a triangular pattern?

Hmmm, interesting if true. ;)

Try to PM Tommy directly and ask him to repost them. He may have unsubscribed from the thread, as he was obviously unhappy with the necessity of ruling out the ISS.

Make no mistake, your work has brought me an enormous amount of joy. Although we look at the universe differently (still), you have definitely changed the way I look at it. So...no matter how it all turns out, be confident you have opened at least one pair of eyes to the possibilities. I'm...

Ah, good to know. I thought I was getting some mixed signals there. I agree. This seems very social to me, we are not calling each other names. I get what you're saying, you are just spewing stuff out and it's rude of me to take it seriously. I understand. You are correct, I can't...

Why is it pointless? I have assumed (considering the venue) that you desire discussion. I apologize if I have misunderstood. If you don't want to discuss your opinions, maybe you should say "I don't want discussion" instead of "in my opinion." This latter phrase is just inviting folks to...

:D Well, you've said much worse things about yourself if I recall correctly. Still, I keep listening to you.

I'm aware of the particular discovery, but I've had issues with calling this planet earth-like: But it would be fair to say that it is the most earth-like discovered so far. So, I am grateful for your post.

It sounds like we agree that it's possible. Are you trying to say that since the unknown craft hasn't been used for commercial opportunities, it must be extraterrestrial? Why couldn't we just conclude that the unknown craft hasn't been used commercially yet? Although some of our previously...

I hear ya buddy, I hear ya. At some point we have to ask ourselves: Have those we've adored become part of the problem? Has the mantra morphed from exploration into mere run-of-the-mill vitriol? Whatever this stuff is, it will likely be waiting for you when you return. Or, who knows, it may...

Why not unknown terrestrial craft? A few? There are lots and lots of radar visual reports of some kind've unknown phenomena, and lots of first-hand reports from law enforcement in many countries. I'm sorry, I don't understand your logic here. We've found about 300 planets, virtually all...

I don't believe he's accusing the children of anything. Not mass murder, anyway. I can't blame him for feeling gloomy. I'm feeling a little gloomy myself. I'm sorry if I've upset you about the 9/11 stuff, I didn't want to at least in hindsight.

Oh, well I'd happily settle for a: "No, because they don't know anything we don't already know" option. I've never seen anything substantive from Dolan or anybody else that convinced me that the U.S. (or any) government is anything other than baffled by the whole phenomenon. There seems to...

David is being modest, he's shown a clear propensity for telling the future (see second para). :D :D :D

I think we need a: "NO, because they have nothing to disclose" option.

Something about the caller's voice just doesn't sound realistic to my own ear. I can't really quantify what I mean, it just doesn't sound like "real" emotion to me. I'm not put out too much by the technical difficulties.