Search results

No it's not, it's the minimum standard requirement for proof of guilt. Fingerprints, DNA, video surveillance, etc etc, are the trump cards now. As for the religious comments, that's your own affair. As far as I'm concerned people will believe what they want to believe. That doesn't make it true.

Offended? Not in the least, I was simply pointing out a few things. And good for the rest of us you responded in a well thought out, exploratory manner and not in the knee-jerk defensive format we dread. I think you'll fit in just fine. For the record though what I was driving at was that...

Welcome Joe. Time for paracast lesson #1: "UFO" means "Unidentified Flying Object", so technically ANYTHING airborne that you cannot identify by sight alone is a UFO. IT DOES NOT MEAN "ALIEN SPACECRAFT". The paracast has a mission statement: seperating signal from noise (ie usable...

Legality has nothing to do with validity.

That is a seperate concept entirely from the "drugs are the answer" approach preached by McKenna and his acolytes. If there are indeed others then it is only a matter of time (however long that span may ultimately be) until their existence is discovered and proven scientifically, either...

No thinking is required for such obvious crap. You see weird shit when you're on drugs? WOW! Did you also know when you stick your hand in water it gets WET? It's shocking I know!

I don't know why people give McKenna credence. My roomies in college did shrooms from time to time, never once did I consider the random nonsense they talked about having seen under the influence to be anything other than hallucinatory garbage.

The internet has the answers! Lucifer O.E. Lucifer "Satan," also "morning star," from L. Lucifer "morning star," lit. "light-bringing," from lux (gen. lucis ) + ferre "carry" (see infer). Belief that it was the proper name of Satan began with its used in Bible to translate Gk. Phosphoros...

To the title of this thread I ask this: When is anything... EVER... good for the UFO community? Even Leslie Kean's recent book tour media blitz at BEST recieved head tilted smirks and mild dismissal, barely an improvement over the usual "little green men from mars" crap that's usually trotted...

That IS the standard. That's the point we're making. This is the paranomal world's lowest-common denominator. There really isn't anywhere "down" from there.

Having listened to C2C periodically out of sheer boredom I think you may be overlooking something important: the audience itself. Frankly, I don't think the average C2C listener cares to be informed. They want to hear a good story, they want to let their minds wander, they want to be...

Okay Gene, I just gotta say it: enough with the "soil samples" thing already. What UFO report in the last 50 years has mentioned soil samples? Maybe a dozen? Half-dozen? Less? Whatever phase that whole aspect of the UFO mystery represented it obviously concluded a long, looooooooooong time ago...

It's a laser, the distance isn't relevant, he might as well have been 4 feet away. Plus he's harrassing a cop on duty. Not that it matters, if one private citizen did this to another they'd have a legitimate complaint. That said, three years is... well, nuts.

Gary A Steven/Orion belt Since there seems to be no official thread-of-the-show for this week I figure I might as well jump in here and say I found it an interesting show. I'm always intrigued by the weird similarities between ancient cultures, makes you wonder about precursor civilizations...

I guess this would be the appropriate thread to add this to:

Ah but now there's spooky music added to it. Spooky music makes everything real.

Always a good show but I gotta say the new radio format is not kind to Jim. Not that he rambles exactly but his stories are complex and detailed and shoe-horning them into 9 minute segments feels akward sometimes. I would agree that Jim did the field of ufology no favours with his pranks but in...

Hmmm...Wal-Mart and the DHS. I'm not sure which is more facistic.

Realistically this doesn't change much. After all, these microboes, however exotic, were still found here on earth which means the supposition that earth-like planets are required for life (whatever it's form) to exist is still valid. We just have to redefine the what part a little as opposed to...

How you got that impression is beyond me. If I'm angry at anything it is stupidity (and those who would preach it) but as to my previous comment, I'm using the rules established by christians for their own religion to point out it's underlying illogic. Emotions don't enter into it.