Search results

  1. D

    Ray Stanford — May 18, 2014 Episode

    I received Ray's email and sent out the following comments to Ray's email list. My main point here, is every time Ray has written or said something to me that could be corroborated through other sources, I have always found his information to check out. Here it was the Socorro symbol and the...
  2. D

    "The Roswell Dream Team Nightmare"

    Here's a novel idea Dave. Until you know the facts first, maybe YOU should keep your collective mouth shut and not criticize people for the questionable actions of others, over which they have no control. The fact is "Dream Team" members DID keep their collective mouths shut while trying to do...
  3. D

    "The Roswell Dream Team Nightmare"

    In all these demands to publicly reveal the photos, everyone needs to understand that no member of the so-called "Dream Team" has possession of the photos or control over them, whether real or not. Ownership is the present holder of the photos (who even I don't know the identity of). Or as...
  4. D

    "The Roswell Dream Team Nightmare"

    This isn't directed at Kieran specifically, but everyone who thinks this could have been a man-made object. NO man-made aircraft back then, or now, could do what Zamora reported and also account for the physical evidence left behind. Again, Zamora reported an egg-shaped, WINGLESS object...
  5. D

    "The Roswell Dream Team Nightmare"

    Here is what I believe to be wrong with your reasoning: 1) Sgt. Sam Chavez of the State Police was probably by Zamora's side within a minute or so of the object's departure from the landing site. In all accounts that I've ever read, they carried on a normal conversation (other than Zamora...
  6. D

    "The Roswell Dream Team Nightmare"

    Here we go again! So my wind information is "fair" and "presents a problem", but only "if Zamora was accurate about that portion of the incident". What a bunch of usual Stalter doubletalk! Here's the basic problem. Zamora described four major landmarks, all of which point to a WSW departure...
  7. D

    Greg Valdez

    I already gave two examples: jet aircraft and helicopters, initially all military, but quickly commercialized within a decade. Nuclear reactors were of course highly classified initially, but the first commercial one to generate electricity was operational in 1951. The first electronic...
  8. D

    Greg Valdez

    Quite. They could be keeping track on the mutilations by some other agency and now and then "carelessly" leave behind evidence of military presence to confuse the issue. The international scope of animal mutilations makes absolutely no sense if it was a U.S. military operation. It would be...
  9. D

    March 18, 2012 — Curt Sutherly

    Strange craft flying in our sky beyond the capabilities of our own technology. If they are real, and we can't make them, who does? The Extraterrestrial Hypothesis is a logical conclusion to the question of "Who makes them?" Just because Sci Fi was discussing "men from Mars" before Arnold...
  10. D

    March 18, 2012 — Curt Sutherly

    It was an interesting and informative interview. The Arnold sighting and Maury Island incident are always fascinating. At times Maury Island is indeed X-filish, surreal, and creepy. It is complicated and strange in the extreme, making it sound like more than a simple hoax by Dahl and...
  11. D

    Jim Moseley Show 1/22/12

    Moseley obviously knows very little about Roswell. Bessy Brazel Schreiber eventually recanted much of her testimony, saying she was probably confusing memories with some other event. Her debris descriptions never did match up well with the alleged "Flight #4", which never existed. Her testimony...
  12. D

    Kimball & Ecker tonight!

    I spoke briefly with Gen. De Brouwer at the MUFON conference a year and half ago. Although publicly the official Belgian AF position was that the extraterrestrial hypothesis should be given serious consideration and not ruled out, I asked him what the unofficial position was, or what he...
  13. D

    Chet Sapalio and the 31 January Paracast Show

    I disagree. If anything, certain aspects of the event have gotten clearer as more and more witnesses have been found, usually with just little bits of information, but often cross-corroborating one another. E.g., there are now at least half a dozen witnesses to something covered with a tarp on...
  14. D

    Chet Sapalio and the 31 January Paracast Show

    He was the first IMPORTANT Roswell witness, but not the first witness and certainly not the last. Many, many other witnesses have corroborated various elements of his story, such as the highly anomalous debris, and the cover-up in Fort Worth with a weather balloon. He did not "shift stories"...
  15. D

    Chet Sapalio and the 31 January Paracast Show

    Berlitz and Moore interviewed Marcel on the phone. Thus Marcel was never shown any photos when interviewed by them. When Marcel was interviewed in person and actually shown some of the newspaper photos (such as by reporter Billy Cox or Linda Corley), he always denied that was the real debris...
  16. D

    Sun 17th Jan 2010 - John Carpenter on Leonard Stringfield

    Lack of opposable thumb puzzled me too until I read the "Allagesh Abductions". According to the abductees, the alien wrist folds in half forming TWO opposable sets of fingers or two sets of "pincers". The grey hand supposedly has two adjacent larger fingers and two adjacent smaller ones. With...
  17. D

    Stanford and O'Brien Episode - October 4, 2009

    Ray was citing information provided by John Shipmann, a student at NM Tech starting in 1966. Shipmann did a series of essays in the student newspaper in the 1980s, and the items about Colgate Ray cites are from this essay, reprinted on Shipmann's webpage...
  18. D

    Stanford and O'Brien Episode - October 4, 2009

    Quote: Originally Posted by drudiak He also mentioned Ted Philips observation of these cases, that you could usually predict the shape of the reported UFO from the...
  19. D

    Stanford and O'Brien Episode - October 4, 2009

    That's the crux of the high strangeness of the Zamora case right there--the silent departure at high speed. The craft was very noisy on takeoff and landing, but then became completely silent as it departed (according to Zamora). No known human craft, then or now, can do this. In addition to...
  20. D

    Stanford and O'Brien Episode - October 4, 2009

    Thank you for the very interesting link, which does indeed have Zamora using the 200 foot number. I hadn't heard that before. It also seems, as you point out, he was indicating where he parked and got out of the car. Actual measurements at the site, however (USAF, FBI), generally placed the...
Back
Top