Search results

I like both Paul and Tony, but Paul is stepping outside his weight class. Tony goes out and turns up original material, Paul doesn't.

Haha, well I didn't think you were wrong. Greer gets under a lot of people's skin, mine too to a point. He throws a lot of crap at the wall, although some of it isn't crap, they are good ideas. He knows his stuff too. A friend who went to one of his seminars said it was pretty intense, classroom...

Whacked as he is, Greer's avenues do lead to Swann and a lot of other things. He's in the mix, he has his ideas. Very few of them are not worth taking a closer look at but he's not a credible source himself. Joe McMoneagle is on the RV subject. Joseph McMoneagle Mind Trek

You might find these recent articles interesting: Numbers Get Mapped In Our Brains Like A 'Sixth Sense,' Study Suggests "objects that look similar might be grouped together in the brain, Harvey said." Could explain the misidentification of similarly shaped objects in RV sessions going back...

That's an interesting comparison. Penetration is a helluva read, but how true is it? It sure comes off like fiction, yet Swann's RV work is a matter of fact especially those Jupiter predictions which absolutely defy any chance of them being lucky guesses. I take Penetration with a grain of salt...

I'll stick with Blender . . . . for now.

As blatantly obvious as Greer is, there are some good ideas buried in there. They're derivative: meditate, use remote viewing as a technique to make telepathic contact with ET, but they're good ideas. I note Grant Cameron is embracing the telepathic contact approach lately. I do have some...

Hell if I know.

Here you go . . . . The UFO Partisan: THE REAL MAJESTIC 12: TRUMAN'S 1952 DC UFO MEETING

That's interesting. I get hits at my website from Germany than any other country except the US and it's really not even close.

Is there deprogramming for internet forum trolls?

I've been to the page . . . don't like the terms of service. ;)

Because the subject of UFOs covers a lot of ground and I, for one, am not interested in every aspect of it. If you're so interested in Jim Courant, what's stopping you from clicking on the FAA database?

One thing we can say for sure is that our exo-planet hunt and finds are backing up the ETH, theoretical possibilities regarding interdimensions and the like are still just that.

Ted Roe from NARCAP was none too happy about Courant's CHD apprearance due to Courant's apparent citing of NARCAP's work. If anyone has interest in looking that close at Courant, he'd be the guy. My guess is Roe and/or Richard Haines already looked into it and if they had something, they'd blast...

Even blind squirrels find an acorn once in a while.

If you're that concerned about Richard Sauder, why don't you contact him directly and ask like a real investigator would? Or contact Dolan about the author he profiles on his website. You could call Dolan directly and ambush him live on his own podcast! Why don't you do that? Oh and why don't...

The gaps! What about the gaps? That's highly suspicious don't you think? You should investigate Sauder . . . he's clearly one of the most well-known and respected UFO researchers out there. Proving he lied about his credentials would prove to be a feather in your cap! Everyone will be shocked...

My Bill Clinton point exposes the idiocy of your argument. You want a scientific example? About | tangledfields Where did she get her undergraduate degree? What was it in? Are there gaps in the dates in her bio? The only date mentioned is 2012, her entire life is a gap . . . . It's not...

If you're trying to make your case via Richard Sauder, congratulations. Who is he? I've never heard of the guy before you dug up his name. Making a broad brush statement based on that is just plain silly. I've already demonstrated that biographical sketches aren't meant to be anything more than...