Search results

It's not the wrong way to approach it. No one, no matter what they think of the case, has suggested the letter is a forgery. It's completely irresponsible. Not David Rudiak, Lance Moody, Ray Stanford, Chris O'Brien or Tim Printy has made such a ridiculous claim backed up by nothing. Printy...

What evidence do you have to suggest otherwise?

Hahaha! Talk about shoddy research. Colgate confirmed he wrote the response to Pauling. There is no "if" involved.

The whole thing didn't really generate all that much publicity even within the UFO field. I would personally love to know the full details of how the hoaxers did it, but the event has intelligent design written all over it. I'm more than a little ambivalent about the whole thing as I never...

Zamora's is one of those cases where I don't think anyone disagrees that he saw essentially what he said he saw, so it had to be something. The ideas I've seen floated are: some sort of experimental lander, either government or commercial, an ET vehicle or the student hoax. I can't really think...

Take a closer look at Zamora's original account. http://www.ufocasebook.com/Zamorareport.html

The source wasn't anonymous. Stirling Colgate is a noted scientist and university president. What Colgate said to Tony was consistent with what he wrote in private correspondence to Nobel Prize winning scientist Linus Pauling more than 40 years ago. Maybe a year or so ago, Tony did some follow...

That's not accurate at all.

Tony doesn't do interviews. I challenged Sanford directly and he chickened out. I repeat the challenge. Make it happen. ;)

Richie and Tony have both been very good to me. As far as the "What's wrong with Ufology" and "Ufology is dead" material . . . . and lots of people write and dwell on this type of thing . . . . there are two quotes from much, much better men than me I keep close to heart. “We must become the...

Gene, I found the lead that Tony followed up on. He did what he did and then I backtracked and took a closer look at Lonnie Zamora's account. I'm as convinced as I can be, without actually having been there, that it was a hoax. The whole story is two clicks away. ;)

Me? No. I've been aware of the talk about the slides/photos for awhile and specifically have not asked Tony about the hubbub. We do correspond on a somewhat regular basis and have for about four years now. I hold him in the highest regard. I expect his recent post is accurate as far as it goes...

I think you're making a lot of claims about circumstances you don't know anything about. We'll see how things play out.

And all that takes some time. Chances are pretty good, assuming this is all legit, the finders don't have a UFO research website.

If I found them in my attic and thought there was a good chance they were legit, I would want to get paid. You could hold me in as much contempt as you like. I might cry about that and blow my nose with a $100 bill. It's a world of financial realities, for better or worse. If that's the hold up...

If the people have the slides and they are legit, they want to get paid. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

I turned up the lead that led Tony to taking a closer look at and solving the Socorro case, but I'm more interested in Roswell right now.

I looked at it earlier, but am not keeping up with the comments. It's unfortunate. To an extent, I do think Richie is somewhat responsible for that, even though I like him a lot too and Tony writes at Richie's blog. He's created an atmosphere where this sort of thing happens which I have brought...

Good research: AUTHENTIC ALIEN IMAGES FROM ROSWELL FINALLY FOUND? by Anthony Bragalia The UFO Iconoclast(s): AUTHENTIC ALIEN IMAGES FROM ROSWELL FINALLY FOUND? by Anthony Bragalia

I don't know Gene, I can't think of too many fields that don't have some heated back and forth. If they turn up anything close to what's being discussed, it will blow the bickering out of the water and if they don't, the whole thing will be quickly forgotten. Just another lead that didn't pan...