Search results

If that UFO had a "pilot," he was drunk! There seemed to be no purpose or "intelligence" behind its travel. It behaved very much like an insect...without much purpose. Perhaps the "Mantis" aliens fly their ships like their insect relatives fly around on earth. Now I am not saying the object in...

As a thought experiment, I often wonder if Earth is nothing more than a cosmic "ark" of biological diversity, purposely placed in safe part of the galaxy free from others, to preserve what exists. Perhaps "evolution" was just the basic mechanism put into effect create the most abundant types of...

Why can't someone, in this case Walter, talk about some more general thoughts on these subjects, speculate on others, and ALSO keep some personal experiences to himself, for reasons that are important to him. I don't think it is at all a dichotomy that a person will share some things but not...

Yea, that sentence read awkwardly, I wanted to change it. I mean "military intelligence" (NOT WALTER HIMSELF!!!!) played a role in how the narrative was crafted (through disinformation and trade craft, something you can speak to). Regardless, I corrected it. Hey, I have been in purgatory for a...

I think there is a collection of skill-sets and knowledge foundations that are useful, but "UFOs" themselves, are simply not fleshed out enough. Therefore, to try and create qualifications for something that isn't well understood could be counter productive. It would be like someone trying to...

I was just your 1000th subscriber.

Looking forward to listening to this one!

I may attempt a tic-tac rendering in the future, stay tuned.

Wow, so calling people a "faggot" is now acceptable decorum on this site. Really unfortunate.

Since Chris posted two more times, I think it is fair I am at least given one reply here. Hopefully this won't be considered an, "attack." If the "digs" are presented thoughtfully and are backed up, I don't see a problem with it (or even think they are digs). Now if I was sitting on this forum...

I actually did respond to Chris very reasonably in private, I have those messages. My comments here were reasonable. The reality is the hosts have very thin skin and take objections to their ideas, presentations style, or support for various cases as "attacks." Chris is doing it currently on a...

I thought this was a pretty reasonable reply, I kept to the point, noted my objection, and provided a link that illustrated how I came to my objection. I don't recall a personal attack. However, the Paracast is a (admittedly) dictatorship, and the hosts are bullies (not an attack, I have again...

Great Episode, the best part is when they asked the guest about Trump, hoping to elicit negative views, but the guest started to make the case FOR Trump, at which time Gene tried to shut him down and steer the guy away from his pro-Trump statements!

You take everything as a personal dig when someone challenges you. I just like to hold people accountable for their views and note the inconsistencies. In this particular instance, everyone is loving how well Vallee did on the show, and how happy you were to have him. That reminded me of the...

Again, I have no problem with honest disagreement. However, that isn't what Chris did in the audio file. He mocked Vallee, made fun of his accent and called his life's approach to research "BUNK." That isn't a very intelligent objection to one's work. It is school yard talk. I would have been...

Chris, all of what you said might be true, but in the sound file you clearly mock the guy, his accent, and his ideas. To date I don't think he has ever done so to you. Moreover, you were not even brave enough to take this issue up with him on the show. I don't think you politely disagreed with...

click on my file above and listen to the genuine disdain in Chris's voice when talking about "JUUUUCK." Insults the guy behind his back, when he can't defend himself, then kisses his rear-end with excitement when he is on the show! Disgraceful. Could you imagine Vallee, making fun of Chris's...

Did Chris do his insulting impression of Jacques and suggest his ideas are "bunk," as was the case in some of his earlier rants? I am betting he didn't. I have sourced my statements above with an audio file from an earlier episode of the paracast.

I just want to point out that at one point someone said they didn't believe the Walton story, and pointed to the fact they were fraudsters, and petty criminals. The witnesses should be deemed less reliable because they were "panicked..." Why would they be panicked if it was all a lie and they...