Search results

My guess is that unless someone can live at least 30 more years, that's most likely right.

There's nothing impossible or unlikely about being a disinformation agent. The government obviously wants to hide the truth but there's more than one way to stop people from getting the right ideas. Besides hiding key evidence they have agents to put out false information. I recall suggestions...

In fact there is a considerable amount of publicly known evidence, such as radar sightings, landing traces, physical damage or injuries and some photos.

Marcel never saw balloons or other mundane stuff before? :rolleyes: The MOGUL mission might've classified but certainly not its materials--easily recognizable to a base intel officer. Yet again..if Marcel and Blanchard had goofed so badly as to mistake ballon junk for a flying saucer, thus...

Oh it would be tough. I tend to be skeptical of reverse engineering stories.

Lol, no need to keep spaceships on ice just bodies.;) Friedman would've answered that if it had not leaked out to some extent, we wouldn't be discussing it now, or for the past 4 decades… The ULTRA secret was very important yet never leaked out until officially disclosed in '75.

Indeed mogul junk wasn't there. Or if you meant wouldn't, there are excellent reasons to "assume" mogul shreds weren't there e.g. the inability of a base intel officer to identify them. That is, even if #4 took place which it didn't. So available documentation, which clearly indicates #4 was...

The only conclusive proof would be disclosure. Testimony of credible witnesses may not be solid proof but it's good evidence--it can have a lot of weight in a court of law. Talk about fantasies, there are no "photos of it" because it was cancelled. The junk displayed in Ramey's office was not...

Read Understanding Roswell. KDR has certainly not given up on the ETH. Sure, our consciousness and our culture shows up on radar and causes landing traces….

😄 It could not have been a MOGUL balloon and was not. The documentation proves #4 was cancelled, and descriptions of witnesses, including the base intel officer, clearly point to something "not of this earth" as Marcel put it. ETI is "unproven to exist" to laymen; it's highly naive to assume...

Has anyone else here read the book? The problem is, all known witnesses are now deceased. KDR certainly doesn't doubt there's plenty more evidence, in government hands. In his previous work, he said in effect the case is at a dead end until the government finally releases what it has. "But...

What was displayed in Ramery's office was junk as the real material went to WPAFB. No, the mundane was used as an "explanation" for any alien craft. As I said before flight number 4 was cancelled. The others are accounted for. A base intel officer couldn't tell the difference between...

As I wrote before, KDR exhaustively investigated all the alternatives. The skeptics long ago settled on mogul precisely because documentation showed that everything else was impossible. Ultimately mogul went the same way, as documentation showed it could not have been responsible. People should...

Flight #4 was supposedly the one (as all the others are accounted for) but as the documentation shows, it was cancelled. KDR mentioned anothrer reason it couldn't have been 4: it was scheduled for mid June but Brazel didn't see the mess on the ranch until July. Inasmuch as it interfered with...

Witnesses like Bill Brazel stated government personnel took what they had found. It makes no sense to demand "extraordinary proof" if the government took it and won't reveal it. Occasionally they also happen in association with UFO/humanoid encounters. Nobody ever did that, although, as KDR...

It would be nice if the proof taken by government or military people were revealed…. UFOlogy or the ETH, is not based solely on witness testimony. Many cases are supported by physical evidence--landing marks, damage, injuries etc. Try reading KDR's books or his blog… There was only one way...

When there is no terrestrial explanation for a technical phenomenon--as has been repeatedly shown with regard to Roswell--and the phenomenon includes reports of humanoid or nonhuman beings, as well as technology, ET is the only reasonable explanation.

Witness testimony may not be conclusive proof but it is evidence. Many times KDR rejected UFO cases or certain reports because he didn't find them credible, and he has investigated Roswell more exhaustively than any other case.

So you're completely unfamiliar with Roswell witness testimony and that of others who noted the government took e.g. film. They are unproven to laymen; you can't assume the government, which took so much evidence, has no definitive proof…Btw we are "space aliens"--from the perspective of the...

But the phenomenon does want to be perceived as a threat. There have been "bad' incidents since 1953, or 1948--Mantell.