Search results

Here we are, talking about 'consciousness', lol. :D I know! Let's marvel over having fingers!

OK.

Perhaps the answer is here...

So...we have enough data and we don't need to get out into the field, plenty of reports and investigations to analyze....Hmmm. This has never been done, right? :) Meanwhile, we're dealing with a phenomenon that very often expresses itself according to the observer. Phenomena that increasingly...

Greg knows I'm all for 'reframing the debate'. I've had this discussion with he and others long before my comments here. I'm on your side, truly.

Try to get three people interested in this field to agree on even the same lexicon. :) In the meantime, get out there into the field because all the chin rubbing and consensus is useless UNTIL you have more experience with what you and others are dealing with. :)

Still too much discussion about discussion. To quote Ben Stiller from the 'Starsky & Hutch' movie: "Do it....DO it...DO it" And Elvis: 'A little less conversation, a little more action...' :D Basically, just get out there, investigate sightings/reports, collect evidence, document it, try to...

I think there is WAAAAY too much talk about talking about it and 'how to talk about it' and let's discuss some more and how about we exercise our talking about discussing the issue of how we'll talk about it, blah blah blah. I say we get out there and do research and when talking needs to be...

The Corey Goode stuff, lol :D

Unless you consider the sort of data as did Vallee. That opens up an entire spectrum which I admit isn't popular with the ETH point of view but offers a little more substantiation than mere out-of-thin-air butt-pulling. I daresay you may be dismissing an entire field of data by relegating...

For the record, yes indeed the ETH is solidly valid because we know outer space and other planets exist, even though we haven't publicly confirmed life out there. The ETH must always be part of the equation when having a discussion on UFOs. However, the whole UFO thing hasn't been 'adequately...

OK, but I think what Greg is also getting at is that the ETH camp must try harder to ask itself what specifically about the cases that they declare of ET origin is the determining factor. There are a lot of folks who use a half-baked process of elimination to get to the ETH, i.e. 'OK, I can't...

You'll have to sign a receipt for Uncle Sam.

Damn it! Once again I miss the opportunity to ask: "WHY, GREG? WHY??!?"

I think you guys can make a great return when you're ready. With a growing demand for a return to a nuts-and-bolts/expansive approach to ufology (instead of the New Agey-Disclosure-Roswell-ETH domination that is finally losing its grip), DMR could really be among the top shows on the road ahead...

I think the point about Vallee, for me, is that the 'something else' is just as present and should get as much attention. I know I've found it to be true so that's why I advocate for the 'something else' to be paid attention to. For what it's worth.

I think a lot of people are at the point where all this effort at discussing the topic has become drab and wearisome and the words just blur in their eyes and ears.

Oh. My. How very...interesting :)

Yes, I did answer it sufficiently, regardless what Smith said. The sentence I have a problem with is not defended by what you just said. This has become circular for the purpose of you feeling good about yourself, Dukie. But it's OK, you can interpret whatever is in that memo however you like...

I answered that already. :)