Search results

Jones' comments were just his typical off-the-top conspiracy theory schtick. While some people pay it little mind, others get all worked-up about it. I don't — The most I do is give Jones a face palm or watch something else. I don't suddenly decide it's time to rewrite the First Amendment. But...

That is not valid counterpoint. Are the videos faked? Can you prove the witnesses interviewed are lying when they're backed-up by the videos? No — so face it, Gene did his usual hand wave, you were just wrong, and the situation was much more complex than you thought it was. The solution is...

Stuff it Gene — the evidence is right there on the video, and who are you to tell if a witness who was right there and attacked by police while trying to get them to help her was lying? Unlike most people, I consider evidence that goes against my biases. I never liked Trump ( you know that )...

So you're saying the victims interviewed are lying and the videos of police beatings are faked? It's NOTHING like Alex Jones' Sandy Hook commentary! So let's drop that strawman, and note that even Jones' "out there" commentary on Sandy Hook should be allowed under the provisions of free speech...

And Yet Another Perspective — The Real Story of January 6th [Link violates TOS.] BTW @Gene Steinberg — The other XenForo platform I post on is capable of displaying and playing rumble videos. This one probably is too, or could be made to do so. Then it would be just one click to play...

To quote Gene: "You might as well say the Vietnam War didn't happen."

Here's another "Other Side of The Story" piece After reviewing 7000 hours of January 6th videos, citizen investigator Gary McBride is calling into question the death of Trump supporter Rosanne Boyland. She appears to be beaten by a police officer while lying motionless on the ground. [Link...

You're the last person who needs to explain to me about outright lying when you've censored out posts of mine containing truths that you don't like.

Comparing the Jan 06 protest to the Vietnam war is just adding to the hyperbole.

BOTH sides pander to their "extremists" — Neither side has an exclusive claim to truth.

BOTH sides cherry pick — that doesn't make them false. That's why to get a balanced perspective a person needs to consider BOTH sides, and not simply write-off the evidence that doesn't suit one's own bias. At least I'm capable of doing that ( despite not liking Trump ).

See the link in the post. I've seen that one, that's interesting, but not the one I'm referring to.There is a Tucker Carlson clip in it though — which of course to you means it must be faked. Nobody is saying there wasn't a protest that got out of hand — "Insurrection" is hyperbole Again...

Obviously neither of you read the stories or watched the documentary because you responded in less time than it takes to do so. So if your minds are already made-up, then what point is there in watching on-scene footage to the contrary? What point is providing facts to the contrary? Same goes...

Those claims have been debunked. The story of the officer attacked with a fire extinguisher is false. He died later in hospital from non-related causes. The others never happened — except for an unarmed woman who was unnecessarily shot dead by a cowardly officer from behind a closed door, and...

I still don't know what you're referring to ( specifically ), so I cannot tell how different the situation is. If what you mean by "Trump's actions" is the same as the President's actions, we can certainly make a case that there have been a number of things set in motion by a number of...

Not totally sure what you're referring to there, but when it comes to ethical decisions, Trump aint the only politician lacking. Virtually all who support vax mandates are guilty ( and BTW Gene, that isn't specific to COVID ) — so no need to delete, unless bioethics in general is totally off the...

Businesspeople use other people as tools to serve them. That's not what government is supposed to be about — at least not here in the West. It's supposed to be the people choosing a government to serve them. That's what the laissez faire Republicans have missed. Governments IMO should not be run...

That's a typical partisan response. Since you believe so much in fact checkers — https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/promise/1341/take-no-salary/ So what other Presidents have done this — just curious?

That's nothing new for almost any of them — especially those lobbied by mega-corps, and who also have shares in those same companies. The only difference is the Trump donated a bunch of his salary to various causes. That is of course played down and trivialized by his detractors as a publicity...

The phrase "not necessarily" does not preclude the possibility that some content may align in-whole or in-part with my sentiments at the time of a post. It also doesn't preclude the possibility that I either disagree or have taken no particular position at all.