Search results

Then ignore it. But I have a thing about standing-up for truth and freedom, and censoring people on key issues around a presidential candidate doesn't fit-in with that — but apparently it does for you. Have you ever bothered to stop for a moment and think how that might look to other people who...

Do us both a favor and just ban me now, because I'm NEVER going to drop it.

That wouldn't bother me at all. Pejoratives, rather than sound reasoning and evidence aren't credible criticism — but I know you have a hard time accepting that. You think that censoring and smearing RFK is sensible — but it's not, and the fact that you refuse to allow discussion on it just...

Trump's a hypocrite. He condemns the justice system for unfairly turning a blind eye to the indiscretions of his rivals while targeting him for innocently holding classified documents — but he also refused to repatriate and pardon Edward Snowden for exposing actual illegal surveillance...

Don't be a hypocrite. Censorship about public health impacts public health and further entrenches the meaningless disparagement of those unfairly accused of "promoting hate" or "disparaging people" or causing harm ( when they're not ). Discrimination against the non-vaccinated is real and you...

The term "antivaxxer" is a pejorative label that mischaracterizes RFK Jr. — as it does with many others. When you decide to have an uncensored discussion about that, where we can look at the evidence in a fair-minded manner, let me know.

The issue isn't what his family thinks, it's whether or not he'd be a better option for President than the others. I don't know all the specifics of what his family thinks. Some support him, some don't. Part of the disagreement has to do with his activism, in which case, from what I've seen...

You still don't see the problem. It doesn't matter if both sides get dinged for the same misinformation if the so-called "misinformation" isn't actually misinformation, but just somebody's often less than well informed if not biased opinion — as has been admitted in court with Facebook. I would...

Nope — that's not the case. I provided counterpoint with video taken at the scene plus documentaries featuring people who were there. Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers: How the Left Hijacked and Weaponized the Fact-Checking Industry An industry that started in the 1990s by fact-checking chain...

Another hand wave — thanks for proving my point for me.

You haven't seen where the fact checkers mislead because you refuse to acknowledge that they are doing it — It's a circular argument. When I do post info that refutes the fact checkers, you hand wave it or censor it because in your mind "it has the potential to cause harm" — very convenient, as...

I give you credit where credit is due. You don't reciprocate. I've posted my counterpoint to the great "insurrection" and I've pointed to info about the problems with fact checkers. You just don't acknowledge it. I even posted documentaries and video evidence — still not good enough for you. No...

Virtually all media delivers propaganda and misinformation, so I don't trash a story based on the media outlet or the personality of the reporter. Instead, I cross reference the content with other reports and dig for the original sources. That's how I fact check controversial claims, including...

US Govt Official Wants Silence On the Leaked Pentagon Docs [Link violates TOS.]

Former Obama Staffer Reveals Corruption Involving Hunter and Joe Biden [Link to hate site removed.}

So you never bothered listening to what the guests had to say because you don't like Megyn — Have I got that right?

Which guest carried the water — Byron Donalds? Arthur Aidala? Dave Aronberg? Brad Smith?

Megyn Kelly tears into trans protesters

Sky News Australia