Search results

yeah thats what I was thinking, the first thing I would do if I found a disembodied finger is call the police. Thats the only thing that would make since, so what happpened to the finger?

That is NOT how it works. The burden of proof is on the person making the original claim. If you make an extraordinary claim, and I suggest to you a known, more prosaic alternative explanation, it is up to you to show that your explanation is the correct one. That is reality, thats how the world...

Well I read it, and it was fair and factual imo. I may not agree with all his conclusions, like the Johnson sighting (cloud? lol) but was aware of the problems of the other 2 cases, and wasn't suprised to see his rebuttal. In the end I agree with most of his reasoning, the points about...

As Ms. Swan would say ......"He looka' lika man" :D:D

I don't think Mr. Mamer ever claimed to be a scientist, however you dont have to be one to employ the scientific method. I would also love to see Shermer or Shostak interviewed, I wonder if they would agree to come on?

I am a skeptic, and I can and do say "I don't know". I also keep an open mind, but an open mind means you are willing to admit that there could be a plausible, mundane explanation, as well as an exotic one. We are all human, we can all be fooled, it's not even that hard to fool us.

I enjoyed this episode, guess I am wierd. I can understand where he is coming from,and alot of what he said was correct, especially when he was talking about science and eliminating bias. I got the feeling he never really looked into the ufo subject with more then just a passing glance. He...

I didn't even see the "disk with a dome" in the full pic, it all just looked like clouds. Dr. Koontz doesn't have to be lying when he said he saw the disk(cloud) move, clouds do tend to move, sometimes quite quickly through the sky.

I would be interested in knowing what other forums my fellow Paracast listeners frequent. I religiously read the following: BAUT forums JREF forums Space.com forums Paracast forums I will occasionally look at above top secret, then I feel my brain decaying and have to close my browser. I...

His appearance in the movie Bruno was hillarious. :D

While I largely agree with you, proof is a mathematics thing. What we need is strong physical evidence, something we can study, something that has reproducability. Blurry photos and videos, anectdotes and feelings will not cut it. My own thoughts on this subject are schizophrenic, I change my...

"I will expose the SERPENTS of SLIME [OM Moderators} for being what they really are: running a rogue, Cold War era-like Co-Intel Operation!" ROFL..."When Woo's Collide" Why do they have to be disinfo agents(lol), why can't they just be delusional kooks? :p

"I think I know what I didn't see" may be more accurate, but it's certainly not as sensational. :rolleyes: In the end I will judge the movie by it's content and not the title, but I am not expecting to see anything new with regards to evidence. It may help "Joe the plumber" gain more interest...

Or maybe what you actually saw WAS a plane.

If by great you mean craptastic....then yeah. I mean come on, "Flying triangle object trying to make its self look like a regular air plane". Then in his ufo pictures he has a fake pic of a crashed saucer and the alien autopsy dummy laying beside it. :rolleyes: I stopped looking after that.

I like the Iranian airforce case. That being said, it is not one single case that keeps me looking up, it is the whole body of evidence that I find compelling, and why I think ufo's are worthy of more then just cursory investigation.

Behold the power of google!!!!!eleventy11!! http://www.kitesrus.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=K/PROD/SLSTA/KiteLights

I lol'ed irl:D:D

Maybe a kite with lights attached for that added "UFO" effect? Who knows, not enough info imo.

It looks like some kinda plant close to the lens... that or a light being...yeah:D