Search results

I could care less who won the election, they are all the same people anyway, controlled by the same mega-corporations. I was referring to the anti-religious bigots. Which are usually liberals, cause they love to disguise their bigotry. Imagine if I said, "I hate all Spanish people...

Again, sounds very tolerant. How dare those intolerant religions exist when people without religion can be just as intolerant or more! :)

Wow, I love reading intolerant statements against something people believe to be intolerant. It's amazing how your always right, if you believe the other guy is wrong. Keep up the stereotypes!!! :rolleyes:

Congratulations! your an actual tolerant liberal! those are VERY FEW and far between. Most liberals are bigots in disguise. Good for you!

We evolved from Elephants this is proof!

what if the answers are already here, just no one wants to accept them? Ball lightning, natural atmospheric effects, delusional prone personalities and basic primitive myth. The ancients saw the same things and said it they were the chariots of the gods, we see the lights, and context them...

Yes I'm sure the government is testing all kinds of things. But I don't see how you can tie that to Alien contact. Seeing something flying in the sky, then saying it's aliens, is jumping to conclusions.

the real question is if there is "genuine alien interaction" at all. Seeing lights in the sky, "Unidentified" flying objects, and interacting with aliens (identifying what they are in the name) is a giant leap. We have a phenomena with lots of mythologies tying it together. but what...

I agree there has been lots of work in the field, but unlike other forms of investigation we have nothing concrete, just a new theory here or there that goes in and out of fashion. Where are the Nordic aliens of the 60's? why did they disappear for a decade or more and then only Grey's were...

Am I the only one that is getting bored with the UFO topic? There is never anything new, if I hear Roswell one more time I'm going to throw something. Over the last 50 years nothing has changes, only new mythologies have rose and died. But NO ANSWERS just a lot of mindless back and forth...

thanks, I always wanted a Giraffe. They are fun makers!

as long as your an equal opportunity religious hater then I can't argue with your beliefs. :-)

well I will admit, if you mean a small sect, and a very American branch of Christianity, and not the Fundamental tenets of the faith, then I have to agree. I know "Fundamentalist's" (I hate that term as it's sooo misleading) that believe that the King James version of the bible is the only...

Well, if we don't make a cartoon of the belief system, lets state it accurately. - God, a Divine Creator, shaped the universe. - Humans were bestowed by that Creator with free will, the ability to choose what they want to think, do and believe. - If humans choose to separate themselves from...

few things are, if any. Most of science is not empirical, that's according to ANY scientific journal. They aren't that arrogant. FYI if you read my post, that has the article on how Peer Review is not a arbitrator of truth, maybe it would open you eyes a bit more. Could you point out why...

Gloss over a very major thing! Something that would prove a great portion of science unreliable. But again, its more important you get to your non-biased opinion that religion is bad. science is perfect (oh yeah, and not a belief system). :-) Bias much?

I'm re-posting some of this info in a new topic because it's pretty interesting think. Below is just a small sample of studies that prove Science is not the arbiter of truth. If that's true, then is it just another belief system? with new basis, and faith? Many people that hang their hat...

Also I'll add this cool article, it's is also amazing how belief creates myth. Like the myth that science knows best. Peer Review and Scientific Consensus : Peer-to-Peer mini-abstract The peer-review process is not, contrary to popular belief, a nearly flawless system of Olympian...

I agree with the charlatans you mentioned, but I have to say that self correcting is possibly true in the long term sense of say, 50-100 year cycles. But if you read the articles I referenced, suppression is currently running rampant through science. I think do impart because of funding...

Historically that's not the case, we loose information, from the Roman era we went into chaos and the dark ages loosing ton's of advancements. Also because it seems relative, science is full of lies and fraud and bias's as which suppresses truth to an amazing degree. We can't put "faith"...