Randall
J. Randall Murphy
I sense someone running out the backdoor because these big questions can not be answered.
The history of epidemiology is not a bogus or a problematic narrative. Real people are dying every year because they don't have access to vaccines. Vaccines have been saving lives for 230 years. None of your evasions satisfactorily address how we manage deadly diseases.
None of your evasions address the actual history of science. You have yet to provide any alternatives for how to deal with diseases that kill little children every year. You have yet to address how a health care system would manage itself without vaccines with epidemics or the general spread of extremely contagious disease.
There's no contemporary book against vaccines I need to read that will better help me understand how you propose to deal with those ten very deadly diseases without the aid of vaccines.
Also, many of your evasions do not directly address the questions I'm posing. You are literally turning a blind eye to death and disease all across the world where vaccinations are not part of those societies.
You can pick on tiny little miniscule aspects of the discussion, and throw up supposed scientific validation, but you have yet, with all your great reading, and deep digging, to provide a single response to how we manage diseases that are lethal and killing babies and children right now.
The fact is all of this material lacks scientific and clinical support. Cherry picked data, inaccurate conclusions, money making schemes, misrepresentations of data and flawed studies stand against all of this garbage and pretend science. Anti vaxxers claim these as truths. Science says repeatedly it's all junk.
If any of it had merit we would see it verified all across the planet in labs, universities, I dependent govt research etc. instead, these people are making millions and millions of dollars through lies - exactly what you claim big pharma is guilty of.
But , the fact remains, these diseases exist. And none of these folk have provided any real world alternatives to stopping these deadly diseases.
Dear Vaxxers,When you can provide valid counterpoint that demonstrates relevant errors in over 50% of the evidence presented in the books and links below, along with references that are readily available without subscription or cost — then we can talk. I was able to borrow most from the library and access the rest online without cost.
NOTE: Valid counterpoint does NOT include criticism of the sources or the character of the authors. It has to address specific points with logic and reason that invalidate the claims and comments made.
NOTE: This is...