Recent content by jbrazel

Well Gulliver, if that's even your real name...this could easily be used to match a political cartoon of the Hindenburg with the words Nasdaq on it or perhaps a card (not a playing card!), so I for one, am not convinced. :p Sorry, the edit button is in the same place as the reply. Not used to...

Daz, he hasn't been following the thread so is unaware of the RV protocol et al. DVS, as DAZ has noted the Rver is only given a 4 digit random number and produced the aforementioned "results". The description David is referencing is in reference to the photograph which is merely for feedback...

Admittedly the hard, solid dry land descriptors don't seem to fit at all but I found, large manmade structure and a strong sense of down to be "hits". Ohhh what could it be perhaps a herd of cattle in Wyoming or an autoparts store outside Moscow in winter David? ;)

It seems pretty clear to me that this particular remote viewing test was a success. However, all that this means is that the viewer succeeded at this one attempt. It does not mean that another viewing will be a success or that all remote viewings are a success. Only additional attempts can lead...

Fahrusha, I agree though Daz does have a list of the chronology/project names on his website which can help sort some of it out. Gondola Wish - ARMY INSCOM - 1977-79 Grill Flame - ARMY INSCOM & AMSAA - 1979-1983 Center Lane - ARMY INSCOM - 1983-85 Dragoon Absorb - ARMY INSCOM & DIA -...

DSM-IV manual perhaps?

Why do you have a standing Remote Viewing Test that frontloads the viewer with information? This is a pretty basic and fundamental flaw in your "challenge" according to every cursory review on the subject of RV that I have ever read.

Your argument is in my opinon not valid. I get that you don't understand that the photograph is feedback and it is not the target that the subject is trying to remotely view which was the crash of the Hindenberg, but honestly "nothing else the viewer says even comes close" seems to be a bit of...