Recent content by Cygnus X1

Yeah Terra theres alot of stuff that sheds horrible light on the case but I just can't seem to wrap my mind around how Meier could fool so many experts and investigators and townspeople and film developers (who've never come forward saying it was hoaxed). It would take sooo much work and he was...

Yeah that one looks very iffy - again theres stuff thats amazing looking and stuff thats laughable (at first glance?) and destroys the crediblilty of all UFO research. It could also be a characteristic of how these craft fly. The one film I was wondering about the craft looks fairly far away...

Its not the mountains its the position of the flag thats totally wrong.

You guys ever think that this could be some kind of conspiracy involving black military ops. The goal to draw in credible UFO researchers then release ridiculous garbage - discrediting the case and destroying real UFO research? Everyone seems to agree that Meier has really hurt ufology. I...

Wow I was just thinking it was funny that in the films I've seen on Utube the UFO's are always stationary (indicating that they are hanging) then I saw this clip where Meier is actually in the shot himself - kinda throws the small model close to camera thing into question. Then at the end of...

I went to clavius.com a well known moon hoax debunking site and tried to get them to answer my simple question about these anomalies. One of the responces to my 3D representation was that the ground in the Apollo image was uneven - this is absolutely ridiculous we can see that the ground...

I was half kidding there. Whats odd to me is that at first there are hundreds of pictures that defy the experts. Over a hundred eyewitnesses to the craft, metal samples sounds etc. It seems the case is headed maybe for some kind of critical mass in the public conciousness. Then a new...

I think they would care because Meier was getting publicity about his alleged contacts and if he was faking it news would spread like wildfire especially in a small mountain community with not much else to talk about.

I'm a little new on the Meier case, other then reading "Light Years" a while back. I just got interested again after hearing M. Horn on Coast to Coast last week so please fill me in on what HWSNBN is? As for what the analysts said they are quoted at the bottom of this document...

Why do I have to do my homework when Micheal Malin - head of Malin Space Systems which designed cameras for NASA, Robert Post from JPL photo labs (Jet propulsion laboratories) and Eric Eliason creator of image processing software for the USGS all did theirs and found the pictures to be genuine...

The photo study I specifically mentioned is not included in this.

How did he achieve the effect of atmospheric haze on this "small model close to the camera?" http://www.figu.org/us/images/pictures/figu/supporter/horn_us/hasenb.jpg You guys really think he was running around all over the Swiss countryside with his buddies with 20 foot long poles or...

Looks like it was pretty populated to me judging from all the houses out there... http://www.theyfly.com/photos/images/f0187.jpg If these are small models close to the camera why are they so hazy indicating distance between the camera and object? As shown in this shot...

Yeah I dunno about that tripod thing, I guess he's saying it appears like a tripod was used when it was supposedly a chest-mounted camera. Again my question, how does the lunar lander rotate 90 degrees and the background mountains stay essentially the same?

I read "light years" once a while back - and like many found it interesting, while somehow too good to be true... After seeing the wedding cake craft photos I laughed the whole case off a few years ago. However I still am perplexed on how Meier took all those daylight photos and films without...